Friday, June 2, 2017

That's Rich, David...

Donald Trump Poisons the World
When reading this ersatz "not liberal, but also not Conservative or Constitutionalist" spokesman for no one in particular, we have to remember that he works for the NYT, and is publishing in the NYT. He got a thrill from Obama's pants crease. In other words, he's a closet Leftist who can't conceal his Leftism and Leftist worship. His latest attack on Trump is based on his - Brooks' - assessment of Trumps morals, based on the statements of his assistants, who assert that nations naturally compete (OMG) yes, compete.

The concept of nations competing is so anathema to Brooks that he relates it to everything moral ("evil" of course) about Trump, right down to the "savagery" of the personal relationships inside the ranks of Trump's team in the White House. Brooks concludes that there is no morality inherent in Trump or his team. None.

That's Brooks for you, and Leftism in general. When attacking the Other, conceal your own team's total non-morality and blatant savagery by claiming to be more moral than the enemy.

WikiLeaks has demonstrated the moral position of the Left, as it exists inside the Leftist Cathedral. There is no tactic which is immoral except the tactic which is not tried (Alinsky). Thus it is immoral to fail, as Hillary proves every time she shows up with new villains in her "defeat by conspiracy-theory du jour". If she accepted her responsibility for her own failure, she would have to admit to not having addressed certain tactics (e.g. Wisconsin), and thereby being personally immoral by her own standardless standards.

When it becomes too clear that the Left has no morality, none, they immediately attack the Other by screeching the same claim about the Other. then top it off with exaggerations: The Left is too moral. Yes, that's it, too moral. They can't tolerate the INTOLERANT, RACIST, SEXIST, HOMOPHOBIC, DENYING MEN ACCESS TO THE GIRLS' RESTROOMS/LOCKERS/SHOWERS/SPORTS. And that's where facts no longer apply to moral claims. Because Lies Work Best, for the Left. The "moral" principle is just this: choose accusations which work in your favor as you compete for power.

Yes, compete.


Mark said...

Fucking moron, that's what you are doing!! You mark any and all as other and call them names. Ffs will you ever try to understand the subtle complexities of the world we live in!? Not everything is black or white; global accords and worldwide cooperation are not agaims capitalism, the free market and competition!

Stan said...

It's difficult to call all the components of the hate-mongering Left by specific names, such as "Mark", "123", "Hillary", etc. By using the simplistic Leftist Class War designations of Three Classes ("Messiah Class", "Victimhood Class", "Othered Class/Oppressor Class") which already exist, and have existed ever since Marx (Karl, not Groucho) designated them in order for the simplistic Left to comprehend Friend vs. Foe, the Left now fully understands who I am discussing. Just as you understand fully, and attempt to deny it with the old, "it's more complicated than that" soft shoe song and dance.

Global Accords exist which explicitly remove the innate authority of the US to exercise its own national authority of self-determination in decisions which affect the citizens of the USA. Those are treasonous and abdicate the governing of USA and its citizens to foreign entities. Those are specifically loved and promoted by the globalists who hate the USA and its citizens, i.e., the Leftist Marxist Messiah Class Warriors.

The intent is not to promote third world societies into first world western wealth. The intent is to rob first world western wealth and give it to the third world societies, with the specific understanding that all societies are perfectly equal, and none should be allowed to have more, expect more, do more, create more, provide more, than any primitive society. Which entails the stripping of the "mores" to give to the "primitives" with no expectations of the "primitives" and the explicit expectation that the "mores" be reduced to the level of the "primitives". This has been true since way before Rouseau, and Marx became the "lights" of the jealous, non-productive, anti-intellectual, anti-rational (Nietzschean), juvenile Left.

Hope that is specific enough for your comprehension. I can explain it in simpler terms if necessary.

Stan said...

Oh yes, about Leftist/Atheist Morality: There is no source for objective morality which is recognized as a universal moral authority, outside and beyond the desires and proclivities of the individual leftist/Atheist.

So "morality" is a totally relative and meaningless term, EXCEPT as it is used to bludgeon enemies with "moral principles" which the Left does not apply to themselves, AT ALL. Thus Leftist hypocrisy is considered a feature of flexibility in morality (for Leftist/Atheists), but is morally egregious when it is a feature of the enemy of the Left.

So "morality" is merely a weapon, for the Atheist/Left.

That summarizes fairly well the moral expectations of Leftism/Atheism.

Mark said...

So you got nothing, no original thought, no explanations, just emotions, insults, childish retort, alright.....!!!!

Robert Coble said...

Mark said...

"Fucking moron, that's what you are doing!! You mark any and all as other and call them names."

I'm confused.

Is calling people names a "bad thing"?

If so, is "fucking moron" merely a new term of endearment?

Ah, logical consistency must seem so passé:

Ralph Waldo Emerson:

A foolish consistency is the hobgoblin of little minds, adored by little statesmen and philosophers and divines. With consistency a great soul has simply nothing to do. He may as well concern himself with his shadow on the wall. Speak what you think now in hard words, and to-morrow speak what to-morrow thinks in hard words again, though it contradict every thing you said to-day. — 'Ah, so you shall be sure to be misunderstood.' — Is it so bad, then, to be misunderstood? Pythagoras was misunderstood, and Socrates, and Jesus, and Luther, and Copernicus, and Galileo, and Newton, and every pure and wise spirit that ever took flesh. To be great is to be misunderstood.

Okeedokee - no more logical consistency for the enlightened intellectually superior post-modernists because - Logic! Reason! Science!

The Dark Side of the Force is strong in this one.

Stan said...

Mark/123 are useful in the short term, because they show the mental situation that the AtheoLeft find themselves submerged in.

But that goes only so far since the same drivel crops up repetitively. So, the troll is filtered.