The Age of Muggeridge

Muggeridge's Law

We live in an age in which it is no longer possible to be funny. There is nothing you can imagine, no matter how ludicrous, that will not promptly be enacted before your very eyes, probably by someone well known.

The rush to appear "Progressive" leads to evermore absurdity, purely because cis-normality must be attacked by attempting to normalize absolutely everything BUT cis-normality. The logical absurdity is guaranteed, meaning that internal contradiction (noncoherence) is normalized. That will fix those cis-normals!

So reaching into the realm of contradictions to be normalized not only produces laughably stupid assertions which cannot possibly be true (Aristotelian speaking), it also ties the minds of the Progressives in irrational knots. Cognitive knots of the Gordian class, not solvable or untie-able, but only released by severing. Believing in logical incoherences is equivalent to insanity - if an internally contradictory principle doesn't work, then double down on it.

The question remains, how many of the irreparably demented class actually exist, outside the obvious Donk Party? How much work must be done to straighten them out? And what type of work would that entail?

Cis-normality involves rules, which is what Progressives hate and fight. There are rules of logic, rules of civility, rules for ascending to power, rules for exercise of power. None of these appeal to Progressives. They are above those trivial mundanities, which are useful only for shaming cis-normals both for having such rules, and especially if they step outside those rules. Which is congruent with the Progressive cis-noncoherence.

On the other hand, because the Progressives have only non-coherence as their grounding, they are without any capacity for shame since they believe both X and NOT X simultaneously, and can use either as the situation seems to demand. This capacity, they believe, places them on a higher plane both intellectually and morally. Intellectually one cannot lose an argument if one believes that both sides of the argument are true and false, depending on the situation. Morally, they cannot be immoral since they make up the principles of morality as they see are beneficial to themselves - and again depending on the situation the moral principles may be changed and even reversed in an instant. Nonetheless, morality is theirs to manipulate, and they cannot be immoral, period. Effectively, they are cis-moral: bubble-gods in their domains.

There are not many absurdities remaining that the Left hasn't already asserted, including denying humanness to humans in the embryonic state, worshiping cop killers, whites hating whites because of whiteness, living in the luxury of western culture which they intend to kill in order to produce equality of thought in utopia, revisionist history to eradicate the racism/slavery/Jim Crow/KKK history of the Donkocrats, the obvious human rights and economic failures of EVERY socialist utopian scheme, the obvious Nietzschean hunger for total power that has seized their psyches while proclaiming "love" and spouting hate.

There are a few absurdities remaining to be normalized, such as pedophilia (a Clintonian passtime), non-governmental theft, rape ( a Muslim passtime), non-governmental murder (again, Clintonian and DNC passtimes). So we'll see. We'll see.

Meantime, we descend deeper into the Muggeridgeocene Era.