A former 40 year Atheist analyzes Atheism, without resorting to theism, deism, or fantasy. *** If You Don't Value Truth, Then What DO You Value? *** If we say that the sane can be coaxed and persuaded to rationality, and we say that rationality presupposes logic, then what can we say of those who actively reject logic? *** Atheists have an obligation to give reasons in the form of logic and evidence for rejecting Theist theories.
Absolutely! We can - literally - ban it. That will work. It is always the best answer. And you will never hear those two words again.
Until you do.
Don't worry. It literally took *years* for us to work 'gnarly' out of our collective consciousness. Now, I was always kinda partial to 'radical', but I absolutely don't miss 'boss' or 'groovy' or 'heavy' or 'cowabunga'.
2 comments:
Can we also absolutely ban "absolutely"?
Absolutely! We can - literally - ban it. That will work. It is always the best answer. And you will never hear those two words again.
Until you do.
Don't worry. It literally took *years* for us to work 'gnarly' out of our collective consciousness. Now, I was always kinda partial to 'radical', but I absolutely don't miss 'boss' or 'groovy' or 'heavy' or 'cowabunga'.
KnowwhatImeanVern?
Post a Comment