Friday, June 16, 2017

Army Lets Penis-bearers Shower with Vagina-People

The Army's New Shower Policy: Bare with Us

In perhaps the most shocking development, soldiers are advised that they "must accept living and working conditions that are often austere, primitive, and characterized by little or no privacy." Among other things, service members are ordered to use the billeting, bathroom, and shower facilities associated with their "gender marker." If women express discomfort "showering with a female who has male genitalia," it will be up to the commander to make accommodations – or not. In some situations, as FRC's Lt. General Jerry Boykin (U.S. Army-Ret.) points out, there's no such luxury. In infantry units or battlefield scenarios, leaders don't have time to sort out bathing schedules.
Apparently anyone who "feels a gender-shift today" gets to shower with the girls. The women lose out to the trannies... again.

The balkanized social structure dictated by the Left now controls the showers. Look out girls!!

11 comments:

Steven Satak said...

I don't care what the Left's current fantasy is, the sailors I worked alongside for 22 years would not put up with tranny infestation. In fact, making out that you were (or getting caught in a homosexual act) was enough to warrant a beating and discharge from the Navy.

The last thing they would do was let you stay on the ship.

Skit said...

Can I ask.. Why do you care so much about transgender people?

Stan said...

Well. If you don't understand why people with penises should not be in the girl's showers, girl's locker rooms, girls restrooms, then I don't believe that anything I can say would suffice to communicate an explanation to you. But I'll try.

Transgenders with penises still want it both ways: be a girl when you dress like one, be a male when you dress like one. They cannot be considered serious until it is irreversible. That means remove the penis. Up until that is done, the "transgender" has not trans'ed. He is still a cis-male. After the irreversible removal, well...

As feminists have learned, he is still not a female. He is a male who is hormoned-up and surgically camouflaged to appear female. On average, he will still be taller, broader shouldered, narrower pelvised, and will win physical competitions with cis-females. That's not speculation, it's demonstrable fact.

Leftist feminists also deny the validity of transgenders based on their original "male privilege", which carries into their faux femininity.

My objection is that the Left has weaponized transgenders, who now are at the top of the Victimhood category, thus trivializing all previous Leftist Victimhood weaponizations (blacks, women, gays, Muslims, Gaia, Atheists, etc.).

In other words, the Leftist, Leninist, Marxist Class War now demands that males be allowed in the girl's rest room. No one voted on that, or any other Leftist demand. Leftist demands are forced on society with no input allowed.

Stan said...

Oh yes. Transgenders are FAR more likely to off themselves. Being a tranny doesn't solve their actual problem. Making new transgenders is actually unfair to the gender-confused, since the actual problem is mental and not physical.

Skit said...

That was not really the question. Lots if things are silly, weird, stupid, shocking, disgusting, etc... why do you care about that one so much? It's such a fringe thing...

Stan said...

Fringe? Really? Under Obama, every school and university had to allow penis-bearing people claiming gender malfunction into all girl's facilities. This phenomenon has nearly decimated a major corporation, Target. Any female sports program is vulnerable to requiring penis-bearers to compete, and one has already become a state champion.

Nothing the Left weaponizes is ever fringe after weaponization.

How can you NOT object to the requirement to allow any male claiming sexual dysfunction into girl's facilities? Merely by claiming "fringe"?

Skit said...

It's fringe in the sense that there are so few transgender people, and even fewer that are in transition. And it's also fringe in the sense that there are not many, if any, reports of people abusing others because of these requirements you complain about.

Look, let's say I grant you that's it's bad, ok? These Obama era rules were horrible! Now, tell me what happened exactly?

Did rapes go up? Were people molested more? Were women terrorised by males pretending to be female? Who suffered because if that? Who was forced to do something incredibly wrong? Do you have any specific examples and stats on how such incidents happen more today than before?

Abraham said...

Skit, don't you see this guy is just spitting right-wing rhetoric without thinking? He won't try to defend his views, they are just intrinsically good to him, makes him feel important I suppose

Stan said...

Har! Abaham, you are a pip.
You defend penis people in the girls' room for no good reason at all. Apparently you think that breaking every common sense rule makes you smart, or gives you some sort of superiority because you are above and beyond morality. You can put rabbits in with lions and claim that it's moral. That's just immature, and without any morality, period.

Abraham said...

I think trangenders are freaking weird and need help, but will you answer his questions? Because I saw no harm anywhere either. Just a bunch of SJWs fighting useless battles and Right-Wing nuts reacting to nothing serious.

Skit said...

Stan, Abraham, we're just talking here, you guys need to chill, seriously... and that's why I am asking what's the big deal here? Are there any evidence that transgender folks are committing crimes or not? I honestly don't know! It seems to be some overblown issue where there is no issue really. That's my point. So I ask again Stan... why do you care so much? Can you or can you not answer my questions above?