A former 40 year Atheist analyzes Atheism, without resorting to theism, deism, or fantasy. *** If You Don't Value Truth, Then What DO You Value? *** If we say that the sane can be coaxed and persuaded to rationality, and we say that rationality presupposes logic, then what can we say of those who actively reject logic? *** Atheists have an obligation to give reasons in the form of logic and evidence for rejecting Theist theories.
Wednesday, February 29, 2012
This is of Great Importance: AGW Solved!
It's a much better fit than CO2, it appears. And it explains the missing upper level heat signature: it's in DC instead. So many issues resolved.
3 comments:
Nats
said...
If this wasn't a comedy post, I'd ask about correlation and causation, by what mechanism is US postal charges driving global warming? and how well has this mechanism been studied and peer-reviewed?
But since it's just a comedy post, I'll just say hi and hope you are well.
You'd think it would be a joke, but the site it is posted from is a "legitimate" climate skeptic. No, I think this is actually the level of debate in AGW.
The obvious error is that they are comparing the temperature change with the total volume of CO2. Instead of comparing the CO2 change with the temperature change. Which looks like this:
3 comments:
If this wasn't a comedy post, I'd ask about correlation and causation, by what mechanism is US postal charges driving global warming? and how well has this mechanism been studied and peer-reviewed?
But since it's just a comedy post, I'll just say hi and hope you are well.
You'd think it would be a joke, but the site it is posted from is a "legitimate" climate skeptic. No, I think this is actually the level of debate in AGW.
The obvious error is that they are comparing the temperature change with the total volume of CO2. Instead of comparing the CO2 change with the temperature change. Which looks like this:
http://www.planetseed.com/files/uploadedimages/Science/Earth_Science/Global_Climate_Change_and_Energy/Related_Articles/carbon_dioxide(1).jpg
The reference site has a large segment labelled as comedy. Good grief. True believers can't take a joke...? Or actually look a source site?
Post a Comment