Definition of "Racist"

Howard Dean: If You Vote Republican in 2018, You're A Racist

We know already, Hillary told us so.

Yes, Really.

Defeated Democrats' new attack line: The Electoral College is racist

The Leftist Narrative Manufacturing Mill is spinning wildly out of control. By randomizing the narrative memes, they might find something that sticks. It doesn't appear that the Rooskie excuse has any traction; after all, the hack merely unleashed the truth. Something more abstract yet uber-moral is needed, and quickly. Let's see. Why of course! Racism always works.

Juxtaposed

Obama says it's a 'personal insult' if black voters don't back Clinton

Dallas cop files lawsuit against Black Lives Matter, Obama

Blackmail: Black Lies Matter

Republicans: We Don't Care If He Is LA RAZA! He's A Victimhood Class - Leave Him Alone, Racist!

More in GOP scold Trump: Stop talking about judge

- Don't EVEN mess with LA RAZA, Racist!

Judge Presiding Over Trump University Case Is Member Of La Raza Lawyers Group

Any reason to attack Trump is a GOOD ENOUGH reason, no matter how stupid it makes you look.

Republican: The Stupid Party.

Top Down Racism

Obama: Not Renting to Criminals is Racist

The Obama administration released a warning Monday telling the nation’s landlords that it may be discriminatory for them to refuse to rent to those with criminal records.

The Fair Housing Act doesn’t include criminals as a protected class, but the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) says refusing to rent based on a criminal record is a form of racial discrimination, due to racial imbalances in the U.S. justice system.

Let's correct that statement:

...refusing to rent based on a criminal record is a form of [common sense], [due primarily due to the lack of reform due to incarceration and the increased likelihood of future criminal behavior, not to mention] the [criminal] imbalances in the U.S. [racial subculture].

There.

Now. That is being helped by attacking police, who respond by not enforcing laws in racial subculture zones (e.g. Baltimore, NYC). That is designed to decrease the numbers of racial minorities in prison to give the impression of Egalitarianism. But it is not egalitarian for either the victimized residence of the racial subculture zones (violent, anarchic ghettos) or for landlords. But those categories don't matter. Landlords especially are Oppressor Class (they expect to be paid). And the victimized residents of racial subculture zones expect police protection (again Oppressor Class).

The Marxist three-class Class War has generated revolutions which were quite bloody and which resulted in the total repression of entire populations, not to mention entire populations eradicated as "oppressors" of one type or another. That is the main lesson of the 20th century - which apparently is entirely lost on the Left and the maleducated millennials who flock to the social-communist, Bernie Sanders, as their savior. Today's Brownshirts likely have never even heard of Brownshirts.

It's Simple: Increased Racism is Due to Racists With Power.

Obama and Holder are directly responsible for the race riots. They immediately cried "racism" and effectively went silent when the facts were otherwise. Obama's son-he-never-had was a strong-arm robber and a thug intent on murdering an officer with his own gun. But the narrative wasn't stopped: "hands up! Don't shoot!"; "black lives [only] matter!". The causal chain goes straight to the highest offices in the land, and two racist Democrats.

Holder’s Hatchet Job
Another look at the Justice Department’s misguided Ferguson report, which caps the former attorney general’s legacy of racial divisiveness

"One lesson should have been driven home from the shooting of Michael Brown by Ferguson police officer Darren Wilson in August 2014: racial interpretations of complex events are dangerous. The media and Eric Holder’s Justice Department initially cast Wilson as a racist who shot an innocent black youth. They were, as we now know, flat wrong. Not only did a state grand jury decline to prosecute Wilson last fall, but the Justice Department itself backtracked and recommended against federal prosecution. The evidence confirmed that Wilson acted in self-defense and didn’t provide a whiff of support for allegations of anti-black bias.

Nevertheless, it bears recalling that the racial narrative did serious damage. It sowed mistrust of police around the nation, especially among African-Americans. The antipolice protests and the shootings of police officers, in Brooklyn last year, in Ferguson this year, and most recently in Houston, were byproducts of the poisoned atmosphere created by the campaign against allegedly racist law enforcement. Perhaps unsurprisingly, shooting deaths of law enforcers spiked 52 percent in 2014, declining in 2015 as tensions eased. (Forty-seven on-duty officers died from intentional gunfire in 2014, compared with 31 the previous year. Twenty-four died as of the end of August 2015, which at the same rate would result in 36 deaths for the year.)"

The Good and the Bad of New America

The Good in New America is that racism is so uncommon that it has to be manufactured by the race profiteers.

The Bad in New America is that racism is manufactured by the race profiteers at every opportunity.

Unified Field Theory of Racism: You're Genetically Racist - So STOP IT!

This article makes the case for genetic racism, which is invisible to everyone but the Victim via his Sociologist. The Victim can tell that you're racist because all that welfare has not made him equal to you. The cause for that effect obviously has only one source, and that is invisible, intangible, undocumentable racism. It's a blanket sort of thing, something like a magnetic field which surrounds whites bringing them good stuff effortlessly, while repelling all the bad stuff over to the poor blacks. It's a force field which only sociologists and their Victimhood Groups can detect. And it's genetically evil of course.

So due to this racist force field, again visible only to saviors of specific minorities, blacks are held back no matter how hard they work, how much higher education they work hard for, how lawfully they interact with local minimarts, and how they do not shoot each other to protect drug turfs.

Except that there are many, many blacks that actually do join the ranks of success that other blacks claim is reserved for whites. How this fits into the Unified Field Theory of Racism: Black Failure to Achieve and General Desperation is unknown. This is because studies all focus just on ghetto Victimhood populations and the government-designed and supported failure populations which have become the Leftist Plantations for the designated perpetual Victimhood groups.

An observation regarding Ferguson and Brown: there has been zero outcry regarding Brown's manhandling of the minority store owner/clerk. This is because the clerk is not of a designated Victimhood Group, and Brown of course, became the worldwide icon of his Victimhood Group. So it is impossible, under Leftist Social Theory, that Brown violated the Civil Rights of another person, even a minority person. One must be of the correct minority in order to have his Civil Rights violated.

This goes back to the Field Theory of Racism, of course. The store owner/clerk was born with the incorrect field polarity since he is not black. Thus he could not under any circumstance accumulate bad things that were done by the racist fields of other people, since the repellant fields are focused on bad things for blacks, only. So his fearful bullying, the trashing and subsequent burning of his business, all that was just something else (undefined by sociologists) and therefore not racism or a Civil Rights violation.

I have long known of the theory that ALL WHITES ARE RACIST(1), but it is only now that I have developed a physical theory for the cause. I think there is a place in history of science for the Unified Field Theory of Racism. I think it could lead to a solution, perhaps wrapping the afflicted minority groups in aluminum foil to deflect the field, and finally allow them to finally reap the rewards of their accomplishments.

(1) And ALL MEN ARE RAPISTS, ALL NON-ATHEOLEFTISTS ARE HOMOPHOBES, ALL HUMANS ARE PARASITES ON MOTHER GAIA, etc.

Michael Brown's Parents at the UN

Michael Brown was a protected Victim Class black. His parents raised him to be entitled, it appears, and they are entitled as well.

We know from security cam footage that Brown was a very large thug, who robbed a convenience store by roughing up and terrorizing the clerk. We know that he was full of marijuana. We know what bystanders report that they saw, which was that Brown attacked the officer in his car. We know the blood spatters are consistent with that. We know that the officer was hit so hard in the head that his brain pan collapsed under the hydraulic force of his brain being compressed by the impact. And we know that none of that matters because Brown was a protected class, entitled Victim Class minority.

The Browns are guilty for raising, defending and denyiing that their thug son was a thug. They are attempting to deflect their own guilt by asserting before a UN Committee, the United Nations Committee Against Torture, that the injured cop be arrested (for not allowing Brown to kill him, apparently). They made demands for "justice", which for the Victim Class means being absolved of any responsibility for their own actions. Michael Brown must be avenged, and the parents have gone straight to the world Messiahs for vengeance.

There is no actual justice in the world of Messiahs and "social justice"; there is hate and vengeance and class persecution of the designated Oppressors. And the Browns have called for just that, a blanket persecution of the entire designated Oppressor Class by the UN. If Michael Brown is found guilty of the attack on the officer, it is a given that the Messiah Class will return to Ferguson to incite the Victim Class to full riot. Evidence doesn't matter; truth doesn't matter. Only vengeance matters, because the Victim Class cannot be other than victims. They have been told that that's who they are.

The Ferguson show has provided a clear-cut example of the operation of the three class system. Two of the classes are parasites on the third class which is the host class, yet is the designated Oppressor Class in the class war. A parasite infected host can either die from attrition and atrophy, or contrarily purge itself of the parasites in order to regain health. In our case attrition and atrophy seem to be the only civilized road, while purging seems to reduce us to the level of the brutes we need rid of. Yet our civilization is compromised to near the point of brutishness, anyway. That's what lawless government does.

The Browns have had their show. The UN has no jurisdiction in Michael's case. So it really is merely a show.

In my opinion, the parents of the officer so damaged by the thug Michael Brown should sue the parents of Michael Brown for having raised a barbarian who was a threat to society, and not containing him. By screaming for justice, they must accept it when it comes.

Campus as Rape Culture

Cathy Young on Campus Rape and the White House Task Force to Protect Students from Sexual Assault:

"Wednesday's announcement of a White House Task Force to Protect Students from Sexual Assault is the culmination of the Obama Administration's years-long efforts in support for the feminist crusade against campus rape. It is too early to tell what new remedies for sexual assault on campus the task force will propose. So far, however, the initiative relies on the same old approach: wildly inflated numbers, the rhetoric of female victimhood, and complete disregard for any rights that the accused may have.

The report from the White House Council on Women and Girls, "Rape and Sexual Assault: A Renewed Call to Action," asserts that one in five female college students are sexually assaulted during their college years, with one 12% of these victims reporting the assault to law enforcement. These figures draw on the Campus Sexual Assault Study, conducted in 2005-2007 at the request of the National Institute for Justice, and a 2007 federally sponsored national study of rape from the National Crime Victims' Research and Treatment Center.

I analyzed the CSA and its numbers nearly three years ago when the administration launched its first initiative to combat campus sexual assault in April 2011, with the "Dear Colleague" letter to college and university presidents from the Department of Education Office of Civil Rights. The vast majority of the incidents counted as assault involved what the study termed "incapacitation" by alcohol (or, rarely, drugs). But "incapacitation" is a misleading term, since the question used in the study also measured far lower degrees of intoxication: "Has someone had sexual contact with you when you were unable to provide consent or stop what was happening because you were passed out, drugged, drunk, incapacitated, or asleep?" This wording does not differentiate between someone who is unconscious or barely conscious and someone who is just drunk enough to go along with something he or she wouldn't do when sober. The questions related to sexual assault by physical force--particularly attempted sexual assault--are also worded so ambiguously that they could refer to a clumsy attempt to initiate sex, even if the "attacker" stops at once when rebuffed.

Three quarters of the female students who were classified as victims of sexual assault by incapacitation did not believe they had been raped; even when only incidents involving penetration were counted, nearly two-thirds did not call it rape. Two-thirds did not report the incident to the authorities because they didn't think it was serious enough."

In an atmosphere where everything which emanates from the government is a lie designed either to protect an ideology or to hide previous lies and scandals, it is not difficult to write off this "report" as a trivial exercise in propaganda. However, it is necessary to know the truth about campus rape and how to stop it. The problem is twofold: First, there is no possible way to trust the data in a cultural/governmental environment where there is no truth; second, the protection of women takes the form of demonizing men and nothing else - women are in general pre-victims in these situations where they are not self-protected adequately, and under the Left, they will remain that way.

The Left is fully responsible for both cases. They have removed all truth from society and are well into reverting it into barbarism. And they scream and sneer at the self-protection of women, recommending instead that they submit passively in order not to upset their assailant into further harm.

Even further, the Left has always been dominated by white males who hate white males, and use every chance to demonize them as pre-civilized and animalistic. This is obvious in the "Rape Culture" Narrative.

They should be proud of their results. They get to blame men, in general. And to perpetuate the Victimhood of women.

Updated: Accumulator of AtheoLeftist Lies, Frauds, Bullying and Racism: August 25, 2013

These lies are particularly difficult to defeat because they pull off the perfect con — convincing young people they can feel virtuous without being virtuous. They can feel good while being bad.
http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/356586/four-lies-left-make-it-tough-change-culture-david-french

Weapons of Mass Destruction: poison gas:

Obama one year ago:


Syria today:
http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/08/21/us-syria-crisis-idUSBRE97K0EL20130821
Gas attack kills 1300:
” George Sabra, one of the leading opponents of Assad, said the death toll was 1,300 killed by poison gas released over suburbs east of Damascus.
"Today's crimes are ... not the first time the regime has used chemical weapons. But they constitute a turning point in the regime's operations," he told a news conference in Istanbul. "This time it was for annihilation rather than terror."

Obama on these gas mass murders: Nothing.

Piers Morgan thinks that a gun just got up and shot a person for fun:

Morgan tweets:
” When an innocent Australian student is shot dead in Oklahoma for 'fun' - America's gun crisis becomes the world's problem.”
Unfortunately for Piers, the gun is not charged with murder: the humans were charged instead.
http://article.wn.com/view/2013/08/21/Chris_Lane_two_charged_with_firstdegree_murder/#/related_news

Too funny: Mayor is taxed out of his own home:

http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/U/US_MAYOR_PROPERTY_TAXES?SITE=AP&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT&CTIME=2013-08-21-06-47-46

Slate lies about Supreme Court action on Voting Rights:

”Hasen aims most of his fire on the state of North Carolina. Although the Tar Heel State as a whole was not a covered jurisdiction under Section 4, many of its counties were, which meant that if the state General Assembly enacted changes to voting laws, they couldn't take effect without the approval of the U.S. Justice Department or a panel of federal judges.

Freed from the strictures of preclearance--and with Republican majorities elected in 2010 and a GOP governor elected in 2012--lawmakers in Raleigh passed a series of changes to the state's voting laws, including an ID requirement, elimination of same-day voter registration and "preregistration" of minors in high schools, and a reduction in the number of days on which early voting is allowed. (Hasen fails to note that last provision is accompanied by an expansion of early-voting sites and hours.)

Hasen describes the new law as "the mother of all voter suppression bills" and asserts that its enactment by North Carolina illustrates, as the subheadline puts it, "why the Voting Rights Act is still necessary."

He thereby commits two logical fallacies: His characterization of the law begs the question by assuming the lawmakers' invidious intent. And his assertion that "the Voting Rights Act is still necessary" is a complex-question (or loaded-question) fallacy.

There is little dispute that the Voting Rights Act is still necessary. There is some question as to whether Section 5 is still necessary, but the court did not address that question. Sections 2 and 3, which allow federal courts to enjoin voting laws and subject states to preclearance after a showing of discrimination were not even under challenge.

The question the court considered was not whether Section 4 was necessary but whether it was proper--whether it was constitutional for Congress to substitute its own judgment for that of lawmakers in (among other places) Raleigh based on a legislative finding of discrimination that hadn't been updated since Richard Nixon was president.”

And,

” Hasen's premise--which Democrats and Republicans seem to agree on--is that what he terms "voter suppression" laws tend to benefit Republicans at the expense of Democrats. Another way of saying that is that loose standards of ballot integrity tend to help Democrats at the expense of Republicans.”
[read it all].

The Washington Post’s smear/”Macaca” Marathon:

http://pjmedia.com/eddriscoll/2013/08/20/wapo-macaca-marathon/

http://www.weeklystandard.com/Content/Public/Articles/000/000/017/162ttlen.asp

Scandal in the Treasury Department:

http://m.nationalreview.com/article/356260/missing-koch-report-eliana-johnson

” In order for Koch Industries or the general public to see the TIGTA report, the IG’s office must refer the case to the Department of Justice for prosecution. If Justice declines to prosecute, all the relevant information remains under lock and key. Critics worry that a highly politicized Justice Department is unlikely to take up cases that have the potential to damage the Obama administration.”

Al Gore compares Warming “Deniers” to racists, homophobes and raging alcoholic fathers:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/wonkblog/wp/2013/08/21/al-gore-explains-why-hes-optimistic-about-stopping-global-warming/

Objecting to the Democrat Ponzi scheme in Democrat failed cities is “RACIST”.

White flight from Detroit became flight of the Responsibles, including responsible blacks, taking the tax base with them. The lower strata is left with the debt accrued by the Democrat governments. Can blacks only survive when whites are there to support them? Why do they riot, then?
http://www.nextgeneration.tv/?cmd=mpg&load=8784&mpid=517

Lies at salon.com:

” Conservatives, particularly white conservatives, feel a burning urgency to find a racial counterweight to the aftermath of Trayvon Martin’s shooting (including President Obama’s public comments about the incident), a logical response to the argument that things like background checks and an assault weapons ban are appropriate ways to reduce the likelihood of another Sandy Hook-style massacre, and anecdotal justifications for indiscriminate policing of dangerous neighborhoods.”

Racial counterweight? They happen almost every day, but they are never of any concern to the racist Left. Obvious racial killings/assassinations vs. the obvious non-racial incident with Martin trying to kill Zimmerman.

Background checks are already in place and assault weapons are already banned.

Salon.com again:
” But these are hopeless pursuits. The incidents they draw attention to fail by definition to underscore the things they believe. They all require projecting motives or details or both into tragic events, to create false dichotomies between shootings perpetrated by whites and blacks. They have the unhealthy effect of creating dueling tallies of white-on-black and black-on-white crime. And ironically they all tend to underscore the argument that more “stand your ground” laws and more racial profiling are off-point responses to these incidents.”

Assassinations are now “tragic events?” Purposeful murder is just a “tragic event”, with no possible evil motivation? Whereas Zimmerman, while getting his skull beaten in, shoots Martin in order to prevent his own death, is a racially motivated Hate Crime? This requires an expletive: Bull Shit! Leftist Bull Shit!

By the way, "failing by defintion" is to say that anything counter to Leftist inversion is - by definition of the Left - just, well, wrong.

Further, it is not possible to Stand Your Ground when you are shot in the back. It is not possible to Stand Your Ground when you are surprise-assassinated by harmless black youth using flashlights to bludgeon an 88 year old man.

Salon’s lies are just flat evil. This proves it:

” I’ll give West, et al., this: If you ignore motive, circumstance, history and (likely) outcome, then liberals, particularly black liberals, sure seem craven. “

Motive:

Zimmerman: save his brain from Martin.
Chris Lane Killers: the shooter “Hates Whites”, by his own admission. “Boredom”? Really? That’s not a motive.
Delbert Belton Killers: who knows?

Circumstance:

Zimmerman: Self defense.
Chris Lane Killers: opportunity and will to kill.
Delbert Belton Killers: opportunity and will to kill.

History:

Blacks used to be discriminated against, so they are justified in whatever they do. Whites may not interfere in black issues such as black crime and blacks killing whoever. Calling on blacks to deal with their issues honestly is racist; in fact, the mere mention that blacks might not be perfect is racist, while black criticism of ALL whites (except Leftists) as RACIST HATE CRIMES WAITNG TO HAPPEN is just fine and even necessary to keep blacks fearful and beholden to the messiahs.

(Likely) outcome:

This is an absurd category: first, self defense is not a guaranteed action, given that one may be killed before the defense is effective. Second, the likely outcome of assassination is death of the victim.

Here is the crux:
” So let’s review: George Zimmerman wouldn’t have shot Trayvon Martin if he hadn’t been profiling by race. And even if he had been, the shooting feasibly wouldn’t have happened if he hadn’t been legally allowed to carry a handgun and didn’t think he was empowered by law to take matters into his own hands. The monstrous killing of Chris Lane has no such back story. The killers apparently had no motive whatsoever, were armed illegally, and certainly weren’t trailing Lane because they believed, based on his race, that he might be a criminal. They are, however, likely to face serious prison time for their crimes. Zimmerman walked.”

The perpetuation of the lie of “profiling” – which cannot be known, but can be asserted without pretense to fact – is racist.

That Zimmerman legally carried a gun is an issue for the Left: no guns, even legally. The last sentence of the article demonstrates that adequately, coming up.

Zimmerman did not take the law into his own hands: he asked the law for assistance, which did not happen.

As far as the killers of Chris Lane having “no motive whatsoever” – how convenient to ignore the Hate Whites tweets of the killer, in favor of no motive whatsoever.

” The kids in Oklahoma weren’t “standing their ground,” and a “stand your ground” law wouldn’t have saved Chris Lane. Neither would a stop-and-frisk regime — the killers were trailing him in a car. “

Blatant admission that the Hate Rants against “stop and frisk” and “stand your ground” do not apply to the crimes in question; even Zimmerman did not use “stand your ground”. But there’s this:

” By contrast, a “stand your ground” environment and a stop-and-frisk mentality were instrumental in Trayvon Martin’s death. Take either away, and there’s a good chance he’d be alive today.”

Neither “mentality” was in play, so this is just false, prejudicial, and Leftist racism.

” Martin in fact personified the statistical folly of stop-and-frisk. If Zimmerman had yielded to real police, they would have, in absence of any suspicious behavior, stopped Martin, frisked him and found only the skittles and iced tea that made his death that much more tragically poignant.”

Zimmerman did not assert “stop and frisk”, and this assertion is outrageously false. He was following Martin and in contact with police.

And here is the Last Gasp for the Leftist NARRATIVE:
” What might well have stopped both killings, though, is making it harder for people, legally or illegally, to come into possession of handguns. That’s a conversation the right is less obsessed with.”

Always: disarm the populace… Always.

But note that Delbert Belton’s assassins DID NOT USE GUNS. They beat him to death with flashlights. Killing happens due to killers. Weapons are everywhere. More and more, so are killers.