Federal Crime and Cover-up

Rep. Gowdy told FOX that Strzok and Page texted about deleting texts.

The Federalist reported:

Gowdy said the explanation for the missing text messages may be fishier than the official explanation, saying he saw Strzok and Page discuss getting rid of texts in a printout of the messages he and other members of Congress received last week.

Culture of Constant Contradictions

Ladies, Remember Men Are Dangerous. Now Share A Bathroom With Them And Don't Carry A Gun.

It's important, I'm told, to be respectful of opposing beliefs. We mustn't be dismissive of viewpoints that differ from our own. We mustn't condescend.

What about viewpoints that differ from ... themselves? For the Left that's OK because Shut UP!

Others by Matt Walsh:

WALSH: This Transgender Person Allegedly Raped A Girl In A Bathroom. Leftists Still Want Men In The Women's Room.

WALSH: We're Still Funding The Abortion Industry, But Let's Be Mad About Trophy Hunting Instead

WALSH: If Kids Can't Consent, Stop Pushing Sex And Birth Control On Them In Grade School

Well, the only absolute principles that the Left adheres to are 1) that rape is OK if it's done by a Leftist who supports women's rights, or a Leftist Victimhood Class member; 2) Abortion is a First Principle of Leftist eradicationalism; 3) kids and sex - Yum - when does the plane to pedophile island leave? 4) Contradictions are a Right Wing Conspiracy Theory.

What Is The Difference Between These?

Bill Clinton, Donald Trump, Bill Cosby, Louis CK, Al Franken, Roy Moore, Anthony Weiner, Harvey Weinstein, George HW Bush.

The difference is that Bill Clinton, Louis CK, Anthony Weiner, Al Franken, Harvey Weinstein, GWH Bush all either admitted to or were caught out in their offenses, while Bill Cosby, Donald Trump, and Roy Moore deny the accusations.

So Cosby, Trump, and Moore are "he said, she said" situations which require analysis of both sides of the issue.

And that means that assigning "Truth" to the accusers is logically false, legally a violation of "presumption of innocence", and a blatant indication of the moral morass in which the political and media hyenas live and play.

The accusers of Moore are self-righteously attempting to disrupt a local election by offering their condemnations in a political war, not a civil discourse of right or wrong based on actual fact and empirical evidence. Now the accusers of Moore find that they must, in the name of equity, either hyena howl at their own abusers and take them down as they wish to do to Moore, OR they must admit to their own egregious behavior in their mob attack on Moore, who deserves at least a fair hearing and a logical analysis of the accusations and the accusers.

The accusers of Moore are not likely to, en mass, admit to their own foul behavior. So the Leftist icons, Clinton, Franken, Cosby will most likely be sacrificed to the Self-Righteous "believe the women" meme that they helped create. Swarming sharks sometimes eat their own. The Left runs as a mob, albeit controlled by their own Narrative; the mob will devour anyone that deviates, or even worse, illuminates the hypocrisy of Leftism.

So two decades after the fact, the Left will devour Bill Clinton. That's two decades of total hypocrisy, logical and moral and political.

Dems’ ‘reckoning’ with Bill’s sexual offenses is the final nail in the Clintons’ coffin

Nolte Nails It

Nolte: No Coincidence Pro-Rape Hollywood and Media are Anti-Gun

By my count, more than 90 women have come forward to accuse disgraced Hollywood mogul Harvey Weinstein of everything from the very worst kinds of sexual harassment to straight-up rape.

Ninety.

Assuming even half of those allegations are true, is it any wonder that Weinstein is so stridently anti-gun? Is it confusing to anyone exactly why an alleged serial sexual predator would devote so much of his energy and wealth towards disarming the public?
Weinstein, however, appears to be the least of it…

According to the latest numbers, there are 67 men in Hollywood who stand accused of abusing women and children. A few of those men are even accused of abusing other men. Moreover, the Hollywood Reporter reveals that “these stories are just the tip of the iceberg. Even now, my colleagues here and elsewhere are on the hunt, chasing hundreds of tips about harassment in many and varied forms[.]”

Imagine that. Those 67 are merely the “tip of the iceberg.”

Hundreds, maybe thousands of victims; their lives forever destroyed by powerful men who see vulnerable women as little more than blow-up dolls created to serve their sexual deviancy.

Is it any wonder, then, that Hollywood, a town ruled by left-wing men, an institution dedicated to sexual abuse and shielding those abusers, is anti-gun, would prefer their pool of victims defenseless?

And it is not just Hollywood.

There is also our national media.

High-powered men work(ed) for NBC News, ABC News, NPR, Vox, the New Republic, the New York Times. Mother Jones… all accused of various forms of misconduct towards women.

If these allegations are true, is it any wonder that the powerful men who guide these media outlets, who shape conventional wisdom within the media, would prefer an unarmed populace, would feel better knowing a woman cannot suddenly equalize a situation with a firearm?

Watch this 78-second video, watch a seething Mark Halperin attempt to humiliate one of his alleged victims, Emily Miller, over the issue of guns:

Halperin stands accused of masturbating in front of women, rubbing his clothed erection up against women, throwing women up against walls… If guilty, should we be surprised that such a man would be so hostile towards a female Second Amendment advocate, an apostle for the idea of women arming themselves?

CNN’s Chris Cuomo believes 12 year-old girls should be exposed to a penis. Of course he is anti-gun.

Alec Baldwin, an admitted sexist bully, is anti-gun.

Gee, I wonder why a monster addicted to bullying those weaker than him is opposed to an equalizer?

We have been told again and again and again and again, that in Hollywood and in the elite media, EVERYONE KNEW, it was an OPEN SECRET.
Thought experiment…

The year is 1992 and Hollywood becomes an industry filled with women who purchase firearms, get the NRA training available to safely learn how to use them, and obtain the permits required to carry what is the only tool available that puts them on equal footing with an abusive man.

In that culture, some 25 years later, do we have a Harveywood scandal? Are there 90 women coming forward to allege the anti-gun Weinstein raped and harassed them?

Now do the same thought experiment with our elite media.

Men who rape, assault, grope, harass, or masturbate in front of women, are not driven by sexual attraction. This appalling behavior is about demeaning, degrading, humiliating, shattering, and debasing women — it is purely a power thing.

And the last thing powerful abusers want is a victim able to immediately equalize the situation through the simple act of reaching into a purse.

Our media and entertainment industries are infected with powerful men who contemplate a city full of helpless, unarmed women like a lion contemplates a herd of gazelle.

There are countless reasons our Morning Joe-elites so desire a helpless population, and not a single one of those reasons has to do with stopping mass-shooters. Despite all these terrible events, not a single elite calling for more gun control can come up with a law that would have stopped even one of these massacres. In other words…

Our elites are not in favor of gun control to stop mass-shootings, rather, they are in favor of using mass-shootings to push the gun control that will result in a more vulnerable populace that is easier to control and victimize.

Hollywood and media elites are all about consolidating power through a centralized government, all about gushing over dictators like Fidel Castro, Che Guevera, Hugo Chavez, and all about making their dreams come true by means of an overreaching government able to bully helpless Americans.

That same philosophy, of course, applies to men who abuse women. Their worst nightmare is a woman with a gun and the training to use it.

So of course our pro-rape media and pro-rape entertainment industry spend billions of corporate dollars on propaganda designed to keep their victims defenseless.

Of course they do.

UPDATE:

Report: Manhattan D.A. to Indict Weinstein on Rape Charges Next Week

Seriously. If it Weren't for Internal Contradictions...

...Leftists couldn't speak at all.

Students enrolled in an Anthropology 101 Lab at the College of the Canyons may be sent to the dean’s office if they purport “identity-based stereotypes.”

According to the Physical Anthropology Lab syllabus, stereotyping someone “based on race, gender, ability, nationality, sexuality, or any other identity” is “considered an interruption and will a) be barred from participating in class, b) lose all participation points for the day, and c) referred to the Dean of Students.”

The two page syllabus, handed out to students on the first day of class, was accompanied with a White Privilege Checklist.

Standard indicators that students may hold white privilege include but are not limited to:

-I can go shopping alone most of the time, pretty well assured that I will not be followed or harassed.

-I can avoid spending time with people whom I was trained to mistrust and who have learned to mistrust my kind or me.

-I can be late to a meeting without having the lateness reflection my race.

-I can choose blemish cover or bandages in “flesh” color and have them more or less match my skin.

The course professor, Amanda Zunner-Keating, clearly doesn’t see the irony in punishing students who reference stereotypes while simultaneously stereotyping every white individual through the white privilege checklist. However, this doesn’t matter to Keating. She allegedly told students that she uses a Freirean teaching approach and that “we are all engaged in an oppressive power structure.” She followed this up with a quote from Paulo Freire: “The educator has the duty of not being neutral.”

Contrary to the social justice themes espoused by Keating, the course objectives are to “analyze behavioral and observational data with the Scientific Method to understand human and non-human primate biology and evolution” and well as to “demonstrate and apply knowledge of skeletal anatomy to primate, hominem, and modern human evolution.”

Making Up Facts for Congruence With the Deplorables Narrative

Prof accuses Trump voters of 'authoritarianism,' 'prejudice'

The University of California, Santa Cruz recently highlighted a professor’s claim that Donald Trump supporters are characterized by traits like “authoritarianism” and “prejudice.”

Professor Thomas Pettigrew says five personality traits led voters to coalesce around a core of “male nativists and populists who were less educated than the general population.”

In a post on the UCSC Newscenter website, the university touts an article by Professor Thomas Pettigrew that was recently published the Journal of Social and Political Psychology, in which he asserts that "authoritarianism, social dominance orientation, prejudice, relative deprivation, and intergroup contact” are the five social-psychological factors that led voters to coalesce around the “male nativists and populists who were less educated than the general population” who he says made up the “core” of the “Trump movement.” [Bigotry Alert! Caution!]

"Many outgroup prejudices characterize dedicated Trump’s followers, not just anti-immigrant [prejudices]." [False: Actually moral revulsion to Leftist LIES, racial profiling and identity Class war which isolates blacks, browns, whites and Asians].

[RELATED: USC prof says Trump supporters are ‘least educated segment of the population’] [Possibly due to fewer PhD psychos]

“No one factor describes Trump’s supporters,” Pettigrew writes. “But an array of factors—many of them reflecting five major social psychological phenomena that form the tinder and the spark—can help to account for this extraordinary political event.”

Pettigrew repeatedly refers to Trump’s election as “unexpected,” but says the phenomenon is not unprecedented, comparing it to the Know Nothing movement in the 1850s, the Wallace movement in the 1960s, and the Tea Party. [Pettigrew is comparable to Lenin, John Podesta and all the Clintons].

In each of those movements, he says, the “tinder” that lit the “fire” of the movement was composed of “male nativists and populists,” who despite allegedly being “less educated than the general population” managed in this case to exploit several “highly interrelated characteristics” common to a critical mass of voters. [Nah. It was Crooked Hillary, the obvious criminal and hater of flyovers; she fully represented the Donks and the likes of this pompous Marxist; note the prejudice of the presumptive elitist against the common person].

[RELATED: Prof: Trump’s immigration policies fueled by ‘racist nativism’]

Pettigrew claims that “authoritarianism,” for instance, initially manifests itself as a “personality orientation” rooted in a preference for “social dominance,” but “typically leads to some form of a right-wing political ideology” [Wrong: it's Left wing as it always has been, ever since the French Revolution, 200+ years ago.] because “anti-egalitarianism” is more common among conservatives than liberals. [False attribution: Egalitarianism is Fully Communist - not admirable: it's Left Wing - always Left Wing: See Venezuela and Leftist support].

“Though found among left-wingers, authoritarianism is more numerous [sic] among right-wingers throughout the words,” he elaborates, adding that “Republicans began averaging higher on authoritarianism [metrics] than Democrats before the rise of Trump.” [Then the metrics don't reflect either Republicans (except RINOs) or Democrats].

“[Trump’s] speeches are saturated with absolutes and fear-provoking statements,” Pettigrew told Campus Reform. “Authoritarians think this way and are easily threatened.” [This is actually stupid, to the core; it is the Left which is threatened by microaggressions, skin color and free speech, and then runs screaming to a Safe Space or riots and burns up their own place].

[RELATED: Cornell to offer course on Trump's 'xenophobic nationalism']

Pettigrew’s article then goes on to address the alleged “prejudice” of Trump supporters, asserting that Republicans have been gradually gravitating toward racists for decades. [Lie. LIE, LIE, LIE. Democrat history starts, sustains and ends with racism, 150 year of anti-black racism, another 50 years of Jim Crow controlled Democrat plantations for poor blacks, and now white-hatred and Asian discrimination, as black racists take over the party].

“Many outgroup prejudices characterize dedicated Trump’s followers, not just anti-immigrants, but anti-outgroups in general,” [Blatant LIE, see just above]. he states. “Since Richard Nixon’s ‘southern strategy,’ [Egregious LIE; the Southern Strategy was a Republican commentary on the strategy obviously being pursued by the DONKS] the Republican Party has employed strategies that appeal to bigotry with ‘dog whistles’—somewhat subtle codewords for race and other minorities designed to be heard by racists but not by non-racists.” [I.e. only you hear such imaginary things].

[RELATED: Prof says Trump exploits 'threatened white masculinity']

Pettigrew contends that “intergroup contact,” meanwhile, is a trait distinctly lacking among Trump voters, observing that “Trump’s White supporters have experienced far less contact with minorities than other Americans.” [Absolute Bullshit. Trump voters most likely interface in their workplaces with more types of people than Pettigrew ever sees. Pettigrew makes up the most outrageous LIEs to suit his Leftist Narrative purpose].

As for the characteristic of “relative deprivation”, Pettigrew disputes the prevailing media narrative that support for Trump came primarily from “unemployed, angry middle-class voters in basic manufacturing areas,” pointing out that multiple analyses have shown that Trump’s voters were actually better off than Hillary Clinton supporters according to various metrics. [Hillary's supporters are/were supporting criminal behavior in order to get something more from the government, including more racism, sexism, handouts, and hatred of the working class. It's so obvious that no serious objective observer could claim otherwise].

Rather, he suggests that perception was more influential than “the actual truth,” saying, “Trump adherents feel deprived relative to what they expected to possess at this point in their lives and relative to what they erroneously perceive other ‘less deserving’ groups have acquired.” [LIE. False. When your job has been shipped to Zimbabwe, and there are no other jobs, you KNOW what's happened and what the cause is. What happened: lose your house, car, ability to support yourself. Cause: government protection of Big Banks (Hillary/Obama) and huge corporations, rather than protecting the American economy, and thus the workers].

When asked whether he believes that the 46 percent of voters who supported Trump all possess one or more of the negative traits identified in his article, Pettigrew clarified that while the generally applicable, they are not necessarily universal.

“Yes, all surveys on the subject known to me show that a majority (but not everyone) of Trump voters show these characteristics,” he told Campus Reform, saying there are “highly-identified Republicans” who defy the mold. [What sort of cobbled bullshit is that statement?]

"RESIST": It's Not a Policy; It's Just a Tantrum With a Name.

Bigotry oozes off this like cheese off of Pizza The Hut. Democrats presume that we, The Deplorables, use illegals (presumably that's who she is representing here) to clean our toilets, nanny our kids, drive us around, when in fact we do those menial chores ourselves here in flyover country. Apparently that is not the case for metropolitan-bound Leftists, who project such inanities. Their world stops well before the end of the subways, and their minds have stopped altogether: "Resist" is not a policy, it's merely a tantrum with a name. And bigotry is not much of a recruiting theme.

More in the Long, Long, Very Long History of Democrat Violence

We don’t have to go back more than century to note that every presidential assassin and attempted presidential assassin who had a political motive was a leftist, a socialist, a communist, or a member of a hippie commune. (Charles J. Guiteau, Leon Czolgosz, Giuseppe Zangara, Lee Harvey Oswald, Lynette “Squeaky” Fromme, and Sara Jane Moore.) [John Wilkes Booth was a Democrat, of course]

Instead, we’ll start in the 1990s. Al Sharpton’s speeches helped inspire people to murder two people in Crown Heights in 1991 and seven people at Freddie’s Fashion Mart in 1995. As scary as David Duke and Richard Spencer are, I’ve never heard of anyone committing murder after listening to one of their speeches.

During the 2008 presidential campaign, among other acts of violence, Obama supporters Maced elderly volunteers in a McCain campaign office in Galax, Virginia. They threw Molotov cocktails at, stomped, and shredded McCain signs on a half-dozen families’ front yards around Portland. Another Obama supporter broke the McCain sign of a small middle-aged woman in midtown Manhattan, then hit her in the face with the stick.

(All this for John McCain!)

At the Republicans’ convention that year, hundreds of liberals were arrested for smashing police cars, slashing tires, and breaking store windows. Police seized Molotov cocktails, napalm bombs, and assorted firearms from the protesters. Elderly convention-goers were Maced and sent to the hospital after protesters threw bricks through the windows of convention buses. On the first day alone, the cops made 284 arrests, 130 for felonies.

That same year, California voters approved Proposition 8, banning gay marriage. In response, left-wing opponents of the measure ferociously attacked Mormon and Catholic churches, smashing glass doors, spray-painting the churches, and burning holy books on their front steps. The mayor of Fresno and his pastor received death threats serious enough to require around-the-clock police protection.Voters' for Prop 8 addresses were doxxed by Democrat officials so that home invasions and attacks on old people could be and were implemented.

(Although the measure would not have passed without the support of black voters, liberals held black people blameless for their opposition to gay marriage. Mormons and Catholics were a much funner target.) [homosexuals even left CA in order to attack Mormons in Utah]

In 2009, one conservative had his finger bitten off at a Tea Party rally in Thousand Oaks, California, by a man at a MoveOn.org counter-protest. At a St. Louis Tea Party rally, an African-American selling anti-Obama bumper stickers was beaten up by two Service Employees International Union thugs, resulting in charges. [A wheelchair-bound black man against Obama was attacked brutally and hospitalized by SEIU thugs]

For the past few years, the media have enthusiastically promoted Black Lives Matter, hoping to galvanize the black vote. The mother of Michael Brown was even invited to appear on stage at the Democrats’ convention. But, as the British discovered with their Indian auxiliaries during the Revolutionary War, having ginned them up, they couldn’t calm them down.

As a result of the media’s tall tales about homicidal, racist cops, Black Lives Matter enthusiasts staged sneak attacks, executing two policemen in Brooklyn, five in Dallas, and three in Baton Rouge.

Liberals know damn well that their audience includes a not-insignificant portion of foaming-at-the-mouth lunatics, prepared, at the slightest provocation, to smash windows, burn down neighborhoods, physically attack, and even murder conservatives. But instead of toning down the rhetoric, the respectable left keeps throwing matches on the bone-dry tinder, and then indignantly asks, “Are you saying conservatives don’t do it, too?”

No, actually. We don’t.

Compiled by Ann Coulter with a few ["essential additions"] by Stan.

They're ALL "one of theirs"

Which is why there is a very sudden call for civility. Right in the midst of all of the calls for killing Trump, as in the now-disappeared article in HuffPo for capital punishment of Trump and his half of the population; the nightly killing of Trump on Broadway, NYC; the infamous beheading "joke"; on and on. The rhetoric is no joke. It demonstrates the Left's end game, revealed by the cognitive dissonance of losing to the Destroyer of Leftist Hegemony.

The rational Left has demonstrated that their moral authority is the "Lord of the Flies". And that "civility" is a concept of pure convenience, not a fundamental Leftist principle. It's how they deflect the obvious blame they so richly deserve by pretending to abjure that which they joyfully created with their 6 month hate rant.

Leftist morality can and does turn on a dime; it is purely an act of convenience, under Consequentialism.

Leftist Hypocrisy

MSNBC Analyst Who Called for Terrorist Attack Now Bashing Guns for Today’s Shooting

Malcom Nance, and internal non-coherence.

Answer: Yes, Because...

...they are primarily Leftist/communists, not gay rights activists (unless it is convenient). Even Muslims who hate and kill gays get higher ranking than gays in the Messiah-allocated Victimhood hierarchy. All candidates for Victimhood status should understand that when their usefulness evaporates, it's "under the bus" for you.

Can Charlotte Pride parade exclude Gays for Trump float?

Fareed Zacharia Proves Leftists are NOT Tolerant

Fareed makes a statement outside the narrative: Guess what happens...

SWEET schadenfreude! Left comes unglitterglued after CNN admits Liberals aren’t that tolerant [video]

My preference for best Leftist response is the girl who claims that bad people must be excluded from tolerance, because bad people are Oppressors (my term, not hers, but her concept):

K. Black @FReshtinggg

@CNN @FareedZakaria Sitting idly by and watching corrupt and vile people further oppress marginalized groups isn't tolerance

And who exactly is she saying is "corrupt and vile"? Well, SHE decides that, not you. And it doesn't include the Clintons or Comey or antifa thugs, or any virtue-signaller, you can bet on that.

Suicide Pact?

The Left wholly owns the MSM, Hollywood, and the bi-coastal and Blue model cities. And they lost to Trump. By increasing their rancor and hatred, they seem to think that will return the votes of the masses to re-enable the tricameral power they previously enjoyed. But will it?

They have removed their masks and revealed their core values. Instead of occupying the left end of a bell curve, they are on a completely removed bell curve outside and beyond rational discussion. No longer even attempting to argue rationally, they have moved into the violence of absurd rhetoric designed to infuriate the weak minded. That part has succeeded. But how many weak minded, irrational utopians can a western society produce at one time?

Their call to violence now is "the Summer of Resistance", which will garner a few more Antifa kids, and a few to acquire guns they can't handle safely. Summer is nearly here. Stay away from crowds.

The Media-Democratic Party Suicide Pact

Never the party of goodwill, tolerance, Free Speech, the Democrats started as the Party of Slavery. Then they were the Party of War to keep slavery. Then they were the Party of Discrimination and Segregation and the KKK. They became the Party of Big Government and Government Oppression Via Welfare-Victimhood-Class Marxist Culture War. they have always been the Party of Flexible Morals a la Alinsky. Their intent to destroy the republic has always been posted on their selective utopian sleeves and on their hearts and minds. They are the Big Tent of hive think. And they hate everyone outside the tent with a visceral severity found only amongst the violently insane.

They will be on the streets and on every screen this summer. They will be hailed as the resistance and anti-fascist. Everything about them will be evil.

When Attack Dogs Get Creamed

If It Weren't For Flip Flops...

...they'd have no position at all.

How To Be Smug About Not Being Smug

Conor Lynch at Salon: We're obviously still way better'n them, but we need to stop being smug about it... or at least appearing smug, so choke it down and fake it, class warriors.

The smug style in American liberalism: It’s not helping, folks — but there’s a better way
Maybe it's human nature to gloat while Trump's voters lose their health care — but it's not the path to victory

We should at least pretend that they are not Deplorable. You know, hold our noses long enough to get their votes. They'll finally figure out that we know what's best for them, and they'll vote and shut up.

Read it as far as you can get without retching...

Dem-ocracy (Actually, It's a Republic, Donks)

Soros Funded Violence at Berkeley Blamed on Milo Yiannopolis

‘Refuse Fascism’ Group Behind Berkeley Riot Received $50k from George Soros

More here:

Look Who Funds The Group Behind The Call To Arms At Milo’s Berkeley Event

And on its Facebook page, the group asserted that the vandalism and arson were not “violence.” Instead, the group argued that Yiannopoulos and Trump perpetrate violence through the policies they support.

“Dismantling police fences is not violent. And to compare preventing someone like that from speaking to the real-world violence that they perpetuate everyday is ludicrous,” reads one post on the group’s Facebook page.

And of course, this:

UC Berkeley Professor [Robert Reich, of course]: Breitbart News/Milo Yiannopoulos Responsible for Riots

Oh Yes: contrary opinions always cause riots these days, don't they. Milo should know that only Leftist claptrap Narrative is allowed peaceful entry to the sacred campus of Leftist idiocy and Leftist terrorism.

Leftist Violence Begins

Deploraball attenders bloodied; batteries thrown at Trump supporters

Anti-Trump Rally Cops Fire Pepper Spray ... Trump Supporters Attacked

I'll not post any more of this; it'll all come out after the day's over.

Just this note: "Love Trumps Hate" has been cancelled for at least the next four years. It's only valid when the Left thinks it is winning a permanent dictatorship of the majority.

Chelsea Manning, You're Free to Go; Assange, You Dirty Dog

If it weren't for hypocrisy, he'd have no personal identity at all.

Obama opens the prison doors for Manning

And this:

"Shorter Obama: It's ok to steal classified & leak it to a Kremlin spy front as long as the revelations mainly hurt Republicans."