Jesse Lee Peterson Interviews Blacks Regarding Trump, Whites, Racism

Is It Distrust? Or

D.C. MCALLISTER: No, Jaylen Brown, Racism Is Not Why Blacks Underperform in School. “A culture of distrust might have more to do with it.”
As D.C. notes, a culture which accuses studious black students of “acting white” has something to do with it, too.

I can't get past the feeling that deep down inside all (almost all?) blacks hate me. And it's not because of my skin tone so much; it's because they are taught to hate, right there in the school system. There culture is regressed - like all Leftists - into rejection of Enlightenment principles, meaning rejecting all intellectual responsibility, personal responsibility,rational cause/effect thought processes, and accepting total Victimhood at the hand of the purveyors of evil Enlightenment values: western culture, creativity, goal oriented responsibilities; cause/effect logic. So all those annoying values are openly rejected - "acting white" - and discriminated against. Not discrimination by western Enlightenment; by themselves. But in order to live in a western culture while rejecting that culture, at least at a primordial level, results in poverty. Poverty of wealth, of course, and also poverty of thought, poverty of vision, and poverty of success despite official opportunity leveraging in their favor.

Victimology requires a class of oppressors, and being a western Enlightenment proponent, I qualify for their Oppressor Class designation, in spades.

It seems to originate in their schools. And it is not possible to tell whether the oncoming black person hates me. But the probability seems to be high that such is the case. That's too bad. But it is not racist to be leery of a population that rejects you and, well, hates you.

You White? Uh Oh.

From The Comments:

Why don't they just cut to the chase & tell us we should all just kill ourselves?

Number ten is why I’m reclaiming “nigger” as the white man’s word.

Lol why bother then? Why not just become a full on racist and be done with it?

When in doubt it's best to play it safe and consider yourself a racist.

Could have saved a lot of time just reading 10 and disregarding 1-9.

You know, if all white people are still racist "no matter what" then their own logic there is no reason for us to stop being racist. In fact, it's very "race realist" in a way, since the white race is apparently genetically destined to be racists. How ironic.

Good old number 10 reminds us of the futility of dealing with SJW's except with dogs and firehoses.

2. Stop making places nicer. Let them stay shanty towns with dirt lawns and businesses with metal bars on the Windows because of how much crime there is in the area.

Not that it matters, here's a little logic analysis:

On CNN: All of GOP are White Supremacists

Why, just being white with an opinion is the same thing as lynching:

THIS Is CNN: Guest Rules the GOP ‘Are’ Neo-Nazis, ‘Old Slave Owners’ Ignoring Lynchings

For anyone who thinks CNN is dedicated to bringing the American people together, you’re sadly mistaken. Case in point two examples from CNN International on early Tuesday and Wednesday mornings where guest Segun Oduolowu declared the GOP to be neo-Nazis while leaders like Paul Ryan and Mitch McConnell are “old slave owners” who ignored lynchings.

Let’s take the early Tuesday comments first. Oduolowu first lambasted the business CEOs who quit the President’s economic councils for even joining them to begin with because “this feels like fake outrage to me” since “[y]ou knew what this man was.” [Beginning at the 4:43 mark]

Oduolowu pivoted to addressing fellow Los Angeles-based guest and GOP strategist John Thomas, informing him that the neo-Nazis are the Republican Party and he’s “in bed” with them [emphasis mine]:

As a Republican, when you have basically sold your soul to the alt-right, to people who are marching the streets of a college town — an institution for high learning where slaves actually built that university. When they are marching and you own the presidency, you pretty much own the judiciary, you own most of the elected officials and the government, what country were they — are they losing? They are the GOP right now. They are the GOP. You are in bed. You are in bed with the enemy, John. So, please, look. I love you, brother, but defend what you’ve guys done.

Roughly 24 hours later, Oduolowu was back at it following President Trump’s controversial press conference saying that there were good people on “both sides” in Saturday’s antifa and neo-Nazi clashes that left well-being counter-protesters caught up in the violence.

Oduolowu argued that it’s unfair to state that “this rabid base of white nationalists and alt-right that support Trump is a small one, but I think it's larger than people really actually realize because when the leadership of the Republican Party are turning their heads and looking the other way when all of this is going on, it shows almost tacit agreement.”

Here's another chance to play "How Many Lies Can You Find In This?"

The Racists are out in force, attacking whites in general.

It WILL get worse. And worse. And...

Democrats and Race

When identity Marxism is the philosophy, and skin tone is the marker for identity, the most virulent skin tone identity will out. The white Leftists might have achieved their ultimate goal (hatred of western culture and whites) by enabling racism beyond mere invective. Not even ironically, it is served first against themselves. And rationally, whites who hate whites are too internally conflicted to survive anyway.

Will this result in BLM vs white Antifa? Hand me some popcorn...

Cause: Superficial Diversity. Effect: Racial Violence and Class Hatred. Success!

From Robert Weissberg at Unz Review:

Diversity vs. Free Speech

Free speech is not doing particularly well on today’s college campuses. The good news is that resistance to the little commissars is mobilizing; the bad news is that this “resistance” consists almost entirely of abstract scholarly essays or grandiloquent soapbox speeches (see here, for example). Indeed, these pontifications have reached industrial scale proportions and scarcely a day passes without me personally encountering boilerplate-like arguments about how intellectual life can flourish only with open debate, why democracy requires tolerating the most noxious views, how an inclusive public forum is vital to solving our current tribulations and on and on.

Great stuff but, unfortunately, all a waste of time. Hard to imagine the opponents of intellectual honesty being swayed by these erudite arguments even if they encountered them. I also seriously doubt that they are even aware of their existence. This is therapeutic, preaching-to- the-choir.

What can be done? Let me suggest that this war against the barbarians is largely misdirected. To be blunt, an unspeakable link exists between the smothering of campus free speech and its current obsession with upping racial diversity.

Begin with a simple question: why now? Surely the social sciences and humanities faculty has been overwhelmingly Left for decades but these ideological leanings never manifested themselves in demands for speech codes, safe spaces, mandatory sensitivity training, persecution of those guilty of micro-aggressions, and cleansing the campus of toxic whiteness.

What has changed is the burgeoning number of African American on campus (“critical mass”) who have been socialized to embrace political activism—marches, demonstration, occupying administrative offices, even manufacturing bogus hate crimes—as the all-purpose solution to whatever ails them. To make matters worse, these students are forever angry, veer toward paranoia, and are exasperated over what they see as the lack of racial progress. Most are in over their heads academically, genuinely puzzled why, for example, they cannot ace Organic Chemistry. Might it be because the classroom building is named after a slave-owner? Or the instructor sub-consciously devalues black contributions to science? That they hold an exaggerated view of their intellectual ability only exacerbates the problem. Now add a dollop of well-paid administrators ( “Dean of Diversity and Inclusion”) who put bread on their tables by keeping campus race relations simmering just below the boiling point. And, of the utmost importance, they enjoy a well-deserved reputation for solving their tribulations, real and imagined, by threats of violence

It is this toxic brew, particularly its penchant for violence, more than anything else that drives campus craziness. If one doubts this overwhelming racial character and its belligerent flavor, visit the website The Demands that (as of December 2015) catalogues student demands from some 80 colleges and universities. Nearly everything is about the plight of campus blacks and the need for draconian measures–mandatory sensitivity training and prohibitions of “hate” that must be implemented.

To appreciate the PC epidemic/diversity link, try a mental experiment in which the Supreme Court had unequivocally, as per 1964 Civil Right Act, banned any racial preferences in college admissions. The decision’s impact would, guaranteed, substantially reduce African American enrollment (perhaps to 2 or 3%) while those admitted could, happily, actually do the required work (and many of these would be apolitical immigrants or children of these immigrants). It would also add more Asian students to campus which, in turn, would mean scaling back Black Studies Departments and similar programs whose existence depended on rabble-rousing academically marginal blacks. In an instant, the likelihood of campus uproars over a Charles Murray or Heather MacDonald lecture would fall dramatically.

This is not to suggest that African American students are the sole source of today’s PC pox. Others campus groups also contribute to today’s anti-intellectual climate, notably radical feminists and airhead snowflake social justice warriors but these groups are easily quarantined or just ignored and, most of all, nobody fears them physically. From decades of experience as a professor, my sense is that nearly all feminists are practical careerists easily bribed with a well-paid tenured position in an autonomous women-themed academic departments plus the usual academic perks—research funds, low teaching loads, travel money, and the like. And, yes, snowflakes may demand trigger warnings for Shakespeare but professors hardly fear confronting such sensitive creatures provided administrators support intellectual integrity. Wacky Queer Studies professors and all the rest may make for entertaining stories on Fox News, but their existence has little to do with suppressing campus free speech.

Campus outsiders cannot imagine how the fear of offending quick-to-anger campus blacks can undermine the life of the mind. I’ve personally experienced it firsthand at Cornell in the early 1970s and this fear has never diminished. The slightest criticism of Black Lives Matter, let alone anything critical of the civil rights agenda, no matter how nuanced, can shut down the school for a week. And truth is no defense against those who sense dog-whistle racism everywhere or believe that only blacks can speak authoritatively on anything, anything that somehow touches on people of color. In today’s environment saying that blacks are disproportionately incarcerated because they commit more crimes is now judged “controversial” if not racist. Nor is it possible to take pre-emptive steps by funding a multicultural center or hiring more black professors to quell eruptions.

Think of today’s PC mania as “incident proofing” the campus as one might spray oil on stagnant water to stamp out malaria. Nobody can anticipate where the next outrage will occur, so take no chances. From white boy fraternities to professors with endowed chairs, everybody must be on full alert. Even a private Facebook post among friends poking fun at a “challenged” black professor invites serious trouble.

And make no mistake: in today’s super-sensitive environment, this orthodoxy is extensive and daily expands as past social engineering projects fail to work. Hard to imagine even a half-way honest discussion of crime, economic inequality, healthcare, financial regulation and the like without some white being condemned for micro-insults or stereotyping. Even those teaching 19th English literature may soon be up on charges if they “forget” to include people of color in their syllabus. Recall that the whole micro-aggression thing began with how to capitalize “Indigenous People.” The swords of Damocles are everywhere and nobody—even those who publically drink the PC Kool-Aid—are safe. Better to remain silent or get with the program.

In today’s campus atmosphere only a fool would try to connect the drift toward totalitarianism with the most sacred of all campus deities, diversity. Even worse would be to point out that that many cognitively “challenged” students cannot grasp the idea that “offensive” facts can be empirically correct and that “ought” is not “is.” How many of those in over their head academically grasp that professors occasionally explicate noxious ideas that they do not personally believe for the sake of a lively discussion? Or that scientific verification, not moral offensiveness or a group’s history of suffering, is the gold standard for ascertaining truth. And, the more diversity the greater the number of enrollees who just cannot grasp these relationships.

The free speech battle really ought to be about the intellectual costs of bringing ill-prepared students, regardless of color or ethnicity, to campus so as to achieve superficial diversity. Making brilliant distinctions between permitted and banned speech or the marketplace of ideas and Western Civilization is beside the point, a safe harbor for those terrified of speaking honestly.

Blacks seem convinced that whites always have it easy, therefore when joining the western culture, blacks also should have it easy. So when they fail, it has to be racism, not personal impairment. Yet they are impaired not only by their own intelligence level, but also by the black culture from which they emerge, and especially by the maleducation which set wholly improper expectations as well as radical, even terrorist, remedies.

Whites cannot win in this warped environment. If whites, unimpaired by IQ, maleducation (think STEM), radicalization and denigration of work ethic, manage to succeed right in the face of non-succeeding blacks, it has to be institutional racism.

The author is correct: no amount of explanation, logic, evidence or cajoling will suffice to quell vituperative nature of the blacks who are victimized by Affirmative Action delusions of personal capability and guaranteed outcomes.

After all, there is no difference between people: none.

So success denied is caused by evil. And evil must be destroyed.

But the evil is not successful whites or whiteness. The evil which preys on blacks is diversity-driven, Affirmative Action type leveraging of access into arenas where they cannot succeed. That is evil; it is ideological and it is Leftist, Marxist Class-War driven. The Left wants only numerical success in enrollment and cares nothing about the inability of the victims it enrolls, and the pain caused by their ideology. Because they can always blame the Other, for that. For the Left, pain within a race is always, ALWAYS due to the racism of the Other, Oppressor Class, and that nasty lie is the evil that needs killing.

Black Racism

NYU librarian laments 'fatigue' from 'presence of white people'

Of course there is no chance that her persistent activism as an SJW in the middle of a predominantly white gathering had anything to do with her racial "weariness" issues. Undoubtedly the rest of the attendendees got a belly-full of her arrogant sacred imprecations regarding the failures of the whites, and even the oppression of their profession. So I imagine that she did get weary of folks politely telling her to knock it off.

Here's Glenn Reynolds' take on her situation:

YOU KNOW, STUFF LIKE THIS MAKES ME WONDER WHY WE EVER BOTHERED TO END SEGREGATION. IT’S JUST SO STRESSFUL BEING IN AN INTEGRATED ENVIRONMENT WHERE PEOPLE ARE DIFFERENT FROM YOU. NYU librarian laments ‘fatigue’ from ‘presence of white people.
If you could send these stories back to 1964, would we even have a Civil Rights Act? Or would most of America have knocked itself unconscious from the massive face-palming?

She admits to being comfortable with her own race, and that helped with the negativity of having to associate with whites.

From this one case might we assume that blacks want "in" to white culture so long as there are no whites there?

Trinity Turnabout

Prof calls whites 'inhuman assholes,' says 'let them die'

Lawmakers want Trinity prof ousted for 'reprehensible' remarks

Trinity Professor Flees Campus After Threats Over Facebook Comments, Issues Public Apology

More Fruits of the Leftist Class War on American Culture

The western Left has made its "progress" based on the identitarian philosophy of culture warfare. If you are human, you are assigned an identity which is mostly based on your cis-skin color and your cis-sex. These identities, or species, are then placed into specific genus classifications for the purpose of identifying "Friend or Foe", according to the prejudices of the - mostly feminist - Leftist aggressors.

Under current Leftist rules of morality, which vary almost daily, should you happen to be a black female then you are at the pinnacle of moral virtue: you cannot be racist, you cannot be sexist, and your position of moral credibility is not to be questioned... period.

At the dirty end of the Leftist spectrum is the white male, that animalistic, rapist-in-waiting, racist, sexist, homophobic, patriarchal, privileged, probably secretly Christian and slave-holding, human turd (who created western culture - that evil system).

After thus defining people by their superficial, skin-deep, innate characteristics, the Left then class-selects for TOLERANCE, AND INCLUSION, meaning themselves only. And by which they mean exclusion and excoriation of the entire portion of the spectrum of humanity that is not themselves.

This sort of human cultural warfare actually begs for the violence it pretends to decry. The Goods are morally bound to swat down the bads. The Bads don't wish to take that sitting down and bash-back those who hate them. Mutual hatred is the objective, and it is easily achieved by this form of Leftist Culture War by Marxist Identitarian Classism. There actually can be no other outcome, and this outcome is the desired consequence. Re: Cloward-Piven.

In the news is white supremacy, the natural emergence of angry rebellion against the Marxist Culture War. And in the news is black supremacy, also the natural emergence of instigated hostility generated by the Marxist Culture War.

The Leftist Culture War is transparently fundamentally hate-based: racist, sexist, self-righteously violent. It is non-coherent in the sense that its core-essence is that which it officially abhors. Non-coherence is not a problem for those who work purely on emotion. The Culture War offers only hate, while screaming LOVE! It is intensely racist and sexist, while accusing everyone else of that. And it sacrifices some sub-populations at the feet of other populations (and lies about both): homosexuals will be sacrificed (and already have been) to the sacred "Peace" of Islam, despite the massive evidence of Islamic torture-murder of homosexuals around the world.

There is no rational defense for this. It is the specific, direct consequence of the Leftist Self-Righteous Identitarianism that has been weaponized against the enemies of Leftist Mind Control tyranny.

If there could be any doubt of the truth of this, it would be dispelled by the overtly violent, treasonous behavior of the Left ever since November 8, 2016, when they found out that they had lost all, ALL of their elected power. (They still own the Deep State, of course). But now, in the Trump Era, they must act more visibly, out in the open using all their hate and vituperative invective in the desperation attempt to regain influence and power. The tactic as always is to destroy. Destroy, and scorch the earth. That is the Resistance.

As they call for destruction of the elected President (essentially destruction of the republic), more violence will be called forth (and paid for). More is coming, because that's the way the Culture War works.

If one Class must fight another Class, it is purely the fault of the Leftist Class War on America. And It's actually what they want.

Finally, the Leftist Class War is heavily Atheist, as it must be for its enthusiasts to declare their own morality to be the Superior Morality, and of Universal Importance. Only under Atheism can such logical contraries and moral inversions become Cant. The real morality in play is that of Nietzsche and Hegel: Nietzsche's relativist, antirationalist Will To Power, coupled with Hegel's Thesis/Antithesis/synthesis for conquest. It is totally transparent to the eye that is not clouded with Marxist messiahism, which is the motivator and structure. Under these intellectual parasites - especially antirationalism - there is no amount of evidence, no amount of rational discourse which can disabuse the Leftist of fallacies, nor defuse the Leftist hatreds.

So we must deal with it using whatever is necessary to defeat it, again. And again. And again.

This Will Fix Everything

The point is to take the wealth, of course.

Could It Be Time To Deny White Men The Franchise?
This redistribution of the world’s wealth is long overdue, and it is not just South Africa where white males own a disproportionate amount of wealth.

So we'll just vote that wealth to ourselves; we deserve it. Because: Victimhood Class Marxism.

"Some of the biggest blows to the progressive cause in the past year have often been due to the votes of white men. If white men were not allowed to vote, it is unlikely that the United Kingdom would be leaving the European Union, it is unlikely that Donald Trump would now be the President of the United States, and it is unlikely that the Democratic Alliance would now be governing four of South Africa's biggest cities.

If white men no longer had the vote, the progressive cause would be strengthened. It would not be necessary to deny white men indefinitely – the denial of the vote to white men for 20 years (just less than a generation) would go some way to seeing a decline in the influence of reactionary and neo-liberal ideology in the world. The influence of reckless white males were one of the primary reasons that led to the Great Recession which began in 2008. This would also strike a blow against toxic white masculinity, one that is long needed.

At the same time, a denial of the franchise to white men, could see a redistribution of global assets to their rightful owners. After all, white men have used the imposition of Western legal systems around the world to reinforce modern capitalism. A period of twenty years without white men in the world's parliaments and voting booths will allow legislation to be passed which could see the world's wealth far more equitably shared. The violence of white male wealth and income inequality will be a thing of the past.

This redistribution of the world's wealth is long overdue, and it is not just South Africa where white males own a disproportionate amount of wealth. While in South Africa 90 percent of the country's land is in the hands of whites (it is safe to assume these are mainly men), along with 97 percent of the Johannesburg Stock Exchange, this is also the norm in the rest of the world. Namibia has similar statistics with regard to land distribution and one can assume this holds for other assets too. As Oxfam notes eight men control as much as wealth as the poorest 50 percent of the world's population. In the United States ten percent of the population (nearly all white) own 90 percent of all assets – it is likely that these assets are largely in the hands of males. Although statistics by race are difficult to find from other parts of the world, it is very likely that the majority of the world's assets are in the hands of white males, despite them making up less than 10 percent of the world's population.

It is obvious that this violent status quo will not change without a struggle, and the only way to do so will be through the expropriation of these various assets and equitably distribute them to those who need them. This will not only make the world a more equitable place, but will also go some way to paying the debt that white males owe the world. Over the past 500 years colonialism, slavery, and various aggressive wars and genocides, have been due to the actions of white men. Redistributing some of their assets will go some way to paying the historical debt that they owe society.

It is no surprise that liberalism – and its ideological offshoots of conservatism and libertarianism – are the most popular ideologies among white males. These ideologies with their focus on individuals and individual responsibility, rather than group affiliation, allow white men to ignore the debt that they owe society, and from acknowledging that most of their assets, wealth, and privilege are the result of theft and violence.

It is time to wrestle control of the world back from white males, and the first step will be a temporary restriction of the franchise to them.

Some may argue that this is unfair. Let's be clear, it may be unfair, but a moratorium on the franchise for white males for a period of between 20 and 30 years is a small price to pay for the pain inflicted by white males on others, particularly those with black, female-identifying bodies. In addition, white men should not be stripped of their other rights, and this withholding of the franchise should only be a temporary measure, as the world rights the wrongs of the past.

A withholding of the franchise from white males, along with the passing of legislation in this period to redistribute some of their assets, will also, to a degree, act as the reparations for slavery, colonialism, and apartheid, which the world is crying out for to be paid."
Shelley Garland
MA Philosophy Student
Shelley Garland is an activist and a feminist and is currently completing an MA degree in philosophy. When she’s not gagging at South Africa’s unique brand of rainbow politics, she’s working on ways to smash the patriarchy.

White men didn't use capitalism to create wealth; white men just up and stole it from blacks, who had it first. It's all in the New History Books we just wrote.

Idiotry Marches Ever Onward

Black Ivy League student claims ‘trauma’ after white professor refuses to acknowledge privilege

A black University of Pennsylvania student recently declared that his fall semester at the Ivy League institution was “traumatic” because he had three white professors who refused to acknowledge their privilege, and one scholar in particular who “constantly perpetuated these systems of oppression … [that] led to me mentally breaking down in the classroom.”

Student James Fisher wrote about his experience earlier this month in an op-ed in the Daily Pennsylvanian campus newspaper.

In it, Fisher opens by saying: “Last semester was honestly the worst semester I’ve had at Penn so far. And all because of one thing: the white professors I’ve had at Penn. It appears that the term ‘privilege’ does not apply to them. Nor do they care to learn what it is.”

Fisher wrote about his experience with one professor, noting that there “were countless times that his lack of acknowledgment of his privilege led to some of the trauma that I experienced in class. He would show images of slaves on plantations and even allow students to say ignorant comments in class.”

“… So, because my professor wanted to protect the voices of the white students who benefit from black oppression, the oppression unfortunately continued. It even led to me mentally breaking down in the classroom,” Fisher wrote.

“And while trying to console me, [the professor] said, ‘There is no way that I could acquire the wisdom that you possess.’ That was exactly what I needed to hear! I think he thought that that was a compliment,” Fisher continued.

“I stopped going to his class for a month. With different emotions going through my head from not only this class but from the Trump election, I did not want to step foot into another white space until I made sure that my mental health was restored.”

The column ended by arguing: “The truth is, you as a single person cannot make up for the horrific things that white people have done to us throughout human history. But that does not mean that you do not have the power to stop yourself from oppressing the students that you teach every day. You have to be invested in stopping racism and oppression every day, not just on your free time.”

Reached for comment by The College Fix, Fisher was asked how he thought white people at Penn benefit from oppressing black people.

“Well, the same way white people in general benefit from black oppression,” Fisher told The Fix.

“So, since we’re oppressed, right, we’re not able to perform at our best, so they use that and they take advantage of their privileges of not being the types of people to be looked at by police, right, by not being the types of people that are constantly scrutinized by American society, and they use that to their benefit,” Fisher said in a telephone interview.

Fisher added that he thinks other black students at UPenn “strongly” agree with him, and that colleges and universities could better accommodate black students if they would stop talking and start listening.

“If the majority of people in that classroom, or the majority of voice that we here in a typical class section, is a white male’s voice, maybe it shouldn’t be heard that much,” Fisher told The Fix. “You know there’s something wrong with that narrative if other narratives are not getting sort of more recognition or more clout.”

“I get that you’re always searching for us [minority students] to get the answer,” he said, “when all you have to really do is just shut up and listen.”

UPenn University Communications declined to comment on this story.

Oh my YES. College is all about having the professors shut entirely up, and listen to pain in the ass, crybaby juveniles complain about their privileged IVY LEAGUE education - where the juveniles educate the professors, who are there just to listen to juveniles and not speak. Yes, I think I've got it.

Ummm

According to the First Term of Obama...

...to say this about a president is massively RACIST and UNAMERICAN:

Dem Rep. John Lewis: I Don't See Trump as 'Legitimate President'

According to the Left, it was massively unfair to allow the world to see the (criminal) machinations of the Hillary/MSM corruption and collusion, which no one denies is the Truth about the Democrat campaign. But Trump benefited from the Truth, so he is "illegitimate". This sort of reasoning is so corrupt that it is difficult to analyze without an Appeal to Post Truth and Will To Power as the fundamental cause, along with blatant racism on the part of Lewis.

But it's OK if Leftists do it; they're speeecial.

Now You Can Pay Up For Being White

Black Activists Launch Monthly Fee System For Whites To Pay Blacks

Ya know, they still owe for the trip to America that their forefathers received. So the debts cancel out. But they might want to look into charging the African tribes who enslaved them originally, and then sold them to the cruise lines that brought them over. Were it not for those black African enslavers, all these domestic blacks would still be in Africa. Obviously that is where they think they should be, rather than enslaved here in the land of opportunity, welfare, affirmative action, cheap illegal drugs and food and clean water and free healthcare at the emergency room. Maybe they should pay the slaver tribes as thanks for delivering them from the problems of Africa.

Demand For Voluntary Black Segregation is Served

Cal State LA offers segregated housing for black students

"Cal State LA joins UConn, UC Davis and Berkeley in offering segregated housing dedicated to black students. While these housing options are technically open to all students, they’re billed and used as arrangements in which black students can live with one another.

MORE: ‘Orwellian,’ ‘ghettoization’: Criticisms mount against UConn’s dorm wing for black males

MORE: Universities, students of color embrace segregated spaces on campus

Meanwhile, at Cal State LA, campus leaders took down much of the online information on the new housing that it posted in late July. And university housing officials and other campus officials rebuffed requests by The College Fix for more details.

If campus leaders are proud of the new housing, they appear disinclined to talk "

Blackmail: Black Lies Matter

Giuliani: Like It Is.

Giuliani leaves Dickerson in the dust, whining.



Maybe I'll vote for Rudy...

UPDATE:
Here's ol' Al Sharpton on the subject of shooting police officers:

SHARPTON: Offing the Pigs

A Simple Computer Algorithm Could Write This Script For Race Riot Support

Fomenting the race war is what the Democrat Party does. It always has; it always will.

Lynch to Dallas protesters: ‘Do not be discouraged’

Attorney General Loretta Lynch on Friday encouraged protesters not to allow the “heinous violence” that occurred in Dallas to silence their “important” voices.

Hillary Clinton Blames Whites, Cops for Deaths of Young Black Men

Hillary Clinton used a CNN interview on Friday to completely embrace the Democrats’ claim that white people and cops must change to help reduce the number of African-Americans killed in tense exchanges with cops.

“I will call for white people, like myself, to put ourselves in the shoes of those African-American families who fear every time their children go somewhere, who have to have ‘The Talk,’ about, you now, how to really protect themselves [from police], when they’re the ones who should be expecting protection from encounters with police,” Clinton told CNN’s Wolf Blitzer.

Obama Pushes More Federal Oversight of Cops After Dallas Attack on Cops

President Barack Obama is harnessing the increasing attacks on police — and the periodic shootings of people by stressed cops — to push his agenda to federalize state and local police forces.

“I want to start moving on constructive actions that are actually going to make a difference,” he said during his evening press conference in Poland when he was asked about the Dallas attack.

Those actions, he said, would be based on the recommendations of the panel that he picked after the 2014 street riots in Ferguson, Missouri. The panel offered “practical concrete solutions that can reduce — if not eliminate — the problems of racial bias,” Obama said.

The dramatic shootings are an opportunity to push that agenda, Obama said. “If my voice has been true and positive, my hope would be that… [the panel] surfaces problems, it frames them, it allows us to wrestle with these issue and try to come up with practical solutions,” he said.

Black Lives Matter, On the White, Patriarchic, Right Wing Racist Shooter.

#BlackLivesMatter’s Cry For Help

BLM, on Orlando Shooter:

Despite the media’s framing of this as a terrorist attack, we are very clear that this terror is completely homegrown, born from the anti-Black white supremacy, patriarchy and homophobia of the conservative right and of those who would use religious extremism as a weapon to gain power for the few and take power from the rest. Those who seek to profit from our deaths hope we will forget who our real enemy is, and blame Muslim communities instead.

But we will never forget.

In case you didn’t notice, Omar Mateen, an Afghani-American radical gay Muslim registered as a Democrat, was really a right-wing, gay-hating, white conservative. No, Black Lives Matter isn’t crazy at all. Why would you say so? More:

Until these systems are defeated, until anti-Blackness no longer fuels anti-Muslim and anti-queer and trans bigotry, exploitation, and exclusion — we can never be truly free.

Nope, perfectly sane. By no means is this a foaming expectoration from a bunch of racist far-left crackpots.

If you should come upon a BLM insurrectionist, be prepared for complete insanity. Especially if you are white. They are black racists who are morally self-enabled to do virtually anything. And they receive no negative feedback from the Left, because they are a Victimhood Class which cannot be racist no matter how racist they behave.

Whiteness = "Badness"

Portland Professor Wants a 'World Without Whiteness'

Professor James Harrison works in the history department and teaches a class called “Race and Racism.”

During his lecture, Harrison invoked the late Beatles member John Lennon:

'Imagine all the people living life in peace.’

John Lennon penned these words in 1971, and my interpretation is that he’s talking about imagine everyone living together in peace. That would be, not necessarily a perfect world, but a good world. And how do we get to that good world is the question. A world without conflict, and to me my interpretation of these words, is it would be a world or U.S. without whiteness in terms of the power structure.

“And it [whiteness] is a social category,” said Harrison. “A social category is a group of people who share common characteristics, but they may never interact with each other.”

By that logic, wouldn’t “blackness” be a “social category,” too? Or any other color for that matter?

There is such a place. It's called central Africa. He should take Al Sharpton with him. But he should visit the Detroit, Chicago and Baltimore ghettos first. Those places are the intersection of blackness and Black Leftism.