Well, It's Philly...

Philadelphia Votes to Remove Bulletproof Glass in Stores Because It’s an ‘Indignity’ to African Americans

Juxtaposed

Obama says it's a 'personal insult' if black voters don't back Clinton

Dallas cop files lawsuit against Black Lives Matter, Obama

Leftists and Democrats: Still Racist at the Core

Sanders' own national press secretary was treated badly due to race.

"MH: Last time we spoke, you told me about some really frustrating experiences you had on the road that you felt were definitely related to being a woman of color. Do you want to talk a little bit about those?

SS: There were multiple instances. There were places where I literally I couldn't get in. I would go to the door, the staff entrance, and people would say, "This is staff only." I'd have to explain to them that I was staff, and they would question me. I would have to say, "I'm the national press secretary. Did you watch me on the news the other day?" It was consistently happening. There was one week where it happened the entire week.

My breaking point was a time when I had let the event staff know I was having trouble getting in places and asked them if they could just really make an extra effort for this particular day, because it had been a long week. Like, "Could you please just let folks know that I'm coming and that I'm black?" You don't think you'd have to say those things, but I said, "Let them know there's going to be a black girl that's going to come to the front and please let her in."

So I got past the first few checkpoints, but then I pulled into a parking spot and a gentleman came running up to my car, banging on my window, yelling all kinds of profanity and expletives, telling me to get the F out of here, this is for staff, and that I didn't belong back here. I broke down in the car. I cracked my window down and I said, "I'm the national press secretary!" I was just crying. Eventually someone came down and let me in."

Apparently even Sanders was appalled at the party's discrimination.

Remember always: slavery, Jim Crow discrimination, the KKK, all are legacy Democrat functions. Anti-slavery, anti-discrimination, anti-KKK all are Republican legacies. The Civil Rights Acts were all opposed by Democrats right up to and including the 1964 landmark legislation passed by Republicans - and immediately claimed by Democrats under Lyndon Johnson, who then gave the blacks perpetual welfare to buy their votes. Blacks have been bought off ever since, despite not progressing out of their Democrat ghetto-plantations.

Republicans: We Don't Care If He Is LA RAZA! He's A Victimhood Class - Leave Him Alone, Racist!

More in GOP scold Trump: Stop talking about judge

- Don't EVEN mess with LA RAZA, Racist!

Judge Presiding Over Trump University Case Is Member Of La Raza Lawyers Group

Any reason to attack Trump is a GOOD ENOUGH reason, no matter how stupid it makes you look.

Republican: The Stupid Party.

Hispanic Leftist Assert Their Own Racism Overtly and Obviously

From Ann:

Ironically, talking like that, they sound like traitors to American culture.

"Liberal Hispanic activists assail Rubio, Cruz as 'traitors' to their culture."

I'm using my "liberalism" tag, but what they are saying does not deserve the word "liberalism."

The OED defines "liberalism" as "Support for or advocacy of individual rights, civil liberties, and reform tending towards individual freedom, democracy, or social equality; a political and social philosophy based on these principles... Freedom from bias, prejudice, or bigotry; open-mindedess, tolerance; (Polit.) liberal left-wing political views and policies." Only that last part, "liberal left-wing political views and policies," applies. I should just use my "left-wing ideology" tag. Avoid the confusion.

So if hispanics are expected to obey US laws, it is treason. That is racist flat-out. But that is in line with the history of the Democrat Party, which has been racist for generations. Why stop now?

Racist By Virtue of Cis-Whiteness

Being white is an unconscious microaggression; So Stop it!

Leave your white skin at the door, or don't come it. Better still, don't come in, just leave and take all white contributions with you. Well, not the building. And not the plumbing. Oh, and not the cell phone and the electrical networks, TV and radio. And automobiles. And gasoline. Leave all that stuff - just all you whites leave.

It's Simple: Increased Racism is Due to Racists With Power.

Obama and Holder are directly responsible for the race riots. They immediately cried "racism" and effectively went silent when the facts were otherwise. Obama's son-he-never-had was a strong-arm robber and a thug intent on murdering an officer with his own gun. But the narrative wasn't stopped: "hands up! Don't shoot!"; "black lives [only] matter!". The causal chain goes straight to the highest offices in the land, and two racist Democrats.

Holder’s Hatchet Job
Another look at the Justice Department’s misguided Ferguson report, which caps the former attorney general’s legacy of racial divisiveness

"One lesson should have been driven home from the shooting of Michael Brown by Ferguson police officer Darren Wilson in August 2014: racial interpretations of complex events are dangerous. The media and Eric Holder’s Justice Department initially cast Wilson as a racist who shot an innocent black youth. They were, as we now know, flat wrong. Not only did a state grand jury decline to prosecute Wilson last fall, but the Justice Department itself backtracked and recommended against federal prosecution. The evidence confirmed that Wilson acted in self-defense and didn’t provide a whiff of support for allegations of anti-black bias.

Nevertheless, it bears recalling that the racial narrative did serious damage. It sowed mistrust of police around the nation, especially among African-Americans. The antipolice protests and the shootings of police officers, in Brooklyn last year, in Ferguson this year, and most recently in Houston, were byproducts of the poisoned atmosphere created by the campaign against allegedly racist law enforcement. Perhaps unsurprisingly, shooting deaths of law enforcers spiked 52 percent in 2014, declining in 2015 as tensions eased. (Forty-seven on-duty officers died from intentional gunfire in 2014, compared with 31 the previous year. Twenty-four died as of the end of August 2015, which at the same rate would result in 36 deaths for the year.)"

The Racism of Abortion

Do black lives really matter? Or just a few black lives?

"OHIO DEM STATE REP: ‘BLACK LIVES MATTER’ CROWD SHOULD PROTEST PLANNED PARENTHOOD:

“Five thousand, four hundred and ninety-nine abortions are in Cuyahoga County, which I happen to represent,” Patmon said in a speech Tuesday. “And 63 percent of them are black women.”

Video at link. As Moe Lane adds, African-Americans have serious moral issues with abortion. It doesn’t stop African-Americans from voting for Democrats, obviously – but their personal attitudes on abortion still remain. So the Democrats are playing with some serious fire, here. Because you may have noticed that the crowd was firmly in agreement with state Representative Patmon on all of this…”
From Instapundit

Blacks killed in abortions and blacks killed by other blacks don't matter. There is no protest for any of them. Only the racist assertion that just those blacks killed by whites, THOSE are the black lives that matter.

This is Leftist and black racism, openly exposed for all to observe.

Instapundit Prowls the Savannah

"AFTER BLASTING TRUMP FOR MEXICO COMMENTS, CNN SMEARS ENTIRE AFRICAN COUNTRY AS ‘HOTBED OF TERROR:’ “What CNN’s racially-driven smear might do to damage Kenya’s future tourism and business economy is yet to be seen.”"
Instapundit.

At least what Trump said is true, but that is not the issue, of course. See, you just don't understand the rules: it's OK when THEY do it.

Micro-Aggressions; What You Need To Know, and More

Democrats Must Apologize For Their History of Slavery, Jim Crow, Ku Klux Klan, and Century of Apartheid Visited On American Blacks

From the American Spectator (read it all, this is just a sampling):

Will Democrats Apologize for Slavery and Segregation?

"You, Congresswoman Wasserman Schultz, along with President Obama and former Secretary Clinton, talk of what happened in Charleston by mentioning the need to discuss “race bigotry and violence” (you), or saying of racism that “societies don't, overnight, completely erase everything that happened 200 to 300 years prior” (President Obama) or calling the Charleston attack “an act of racist terror” (Secretary Clinton). But somehow you never get around to saying just who was doing all of this — your political party. The Democrats.

In fact, as I noted here in 2008, the Democratic National Committee — on the eve of the Obama nomination — went out of its way to deliberately erase a full fifty years of Democratic Party history from the official DNC website. What was erased? All reference to your party’s role in slavery, segregation, lynching, and the rest. Those platforms that supported slavery, mentioned above? The number of Democrats who occupied the White House while owning slaves? The platforms that supported segregation — and the Democratic presidents, senators, governors and more who supported segregation? The tie between Democrats and the Klan? All of this and more was simply gone from your website — deliberately and willfully hidden from voters while trying to leave the impression that your party was a historically enthusiastic supporter of civil rights. Which, to understate, is not true.

Amid all the tragedy of Charleston, I would suggest that it is finally time for the Democratic Party — the party you chair — to come forward and admit its role in this long-running national horror. It’s time — way, way past time — for an apology. An apology directly from the leaders of the Democratic Party to black Americans, not to mention the rest of the country, for what your party has done.

And instead of raising all those millions for the next election? How about raising some millions from all your rich donors to pay black Americans for the damage you have done to them since the inception of your slavery/segregation and race-based party in 1800?"

The Democrats were formed as a political party based solely on support for racism and its, yes, "national horror". It is different now only in its tactics, not in its foundational premises. (Remember that abortion was founded on racist attempts to reduce the number of blacks; abortion is still focused heavily on blacks, as is the destruction of black families through welfare policies).

Charen Takes On Democrat Historical Revisionism

As Clinton tries to connect Republicans to racism, it is important to continue to illuminate the actual, very real history of the Democrat Party as the ground zero of slavery and racism.

Whitewashing the Democratic Party’s History

"Here’s what the former president of the United States had to say when he eulogized his mentor, an Arkansas senator:

We come to celebrate and give thanks for the remarkable life of J. William Fulbright, a life that changed our country and our world forever and for the better . . . In the work he did, the words he spoke and the life he lived, Bill Fulbright stood against the 20th century’s most destructive forces and fought to advance its brightest hopes.

So spoke President William J. Clinton in 1995 of a man who was among the 99 Democrats in Congress to sign the “Southern Manifesto” in 1956. (Two Republicans also signed it.) The Southern Manifesto declared the signatories’ opposition to the Supreme Court’s decision in Brown v. Board of Education and commitment to segregation forever. Fulbright was also among those who filibustered the Civil Rights Act of 1964. That filibuster continued for 83 days.

Speaking of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, let’s review (since they don’t teach this in schools): The percentage of House Democrats who supported the legislation? 61 percent. House Republicans? 80 percent. In the Senate, 69 percent of Democrats voted yes, compared with 82 percent of Republicans. (Barry Goldwater, a supporter of the NAACP, voted no because he thought it was unconstitutional.)

When he was running for president in 2000, former Vice President Al Gore told the NAACP that his father, Senator Al Gore, Sr., had lost his Senate seat because he voted for the Civil Rights Act. Uplifting story — except it’s false. Gore Sr. voted against the Civil Rights Act. He lost in 1970 in a race that focused on prayer in public schools, the Vietnam War, and the Supreme Court.

Al Gore’s reframing of the relevant history is the story of the Democratic Party in microcosm. The party’s history is pockmarked with racism and terror. The Democrats were the party of slavery, black codes, Jim Crow, and that miserable terrorist excrescence, the Ku Klux Klan. Republicans were the party of Lincoln, of Reconstruction, of anti-lynching laws, of the civil rights acts of 1875, 1957, 1960, and 1964. Were all Republicans models of rectitude on racial matters? Hardly. Were they a heck of a lot better than the Democrats? Without question.

As recently as 2010, the Senate president pro tempore was former Exalted Cyclops Robert Byrd (D., West Virginia). Rather than acknowledge their sorry history, modern Democrats have rewritten it.

You may recall that when MSNBC was commemorating the 50th anniversary of segregationist George Wallace’s “Stand in the Schoolhouse Door” stunt to prevent the integration of the University of Alabama, the network identified Wallace as “R., Alabama.”

The Democrats have been sedulously rewriting history for decades. Their preferred version pretends that all of the Democratic racists and segregationists left their party and became Republicans starting in the 1960s. How convenient. If it were true that the South began to turn Republican due to Lyndon Johnson’s passage of the Civil Rights Act, you would expect that the Deep South, the states most associated with racism, would have been the first to move. That’s not what happened. The first southern states to trend Republican were on the periphery: North Carolina, Virginia, Texas, Tennessee, and Florida. (George Wallace lost these voters in his 1968 bid.) The voters who first migrated to the Republican Party were suburban, prosperous, “New South” types. The more Republican the South has become, the less racist.

Is it unforgivable that Bill Clinton praised a former segregationist? No. Fulbright renounced his racist past, as did Robert Byrd and Al Gore Sr. It would be immoral and unjust to misrepresent the history.

What is unforgivable is the way Democrats are still using race to foment hatred. Remember what happened to Trent Lott when he uttered a few dumb words about former segregationist Strom Thurmond? He didn’t get the kind of pass Bill Clinton did when praising Fulbright. Earlier this month, Hillary Clinton told a mostly black audience that “What is happening is a sweeping effort to disempower and disenfranchise people of color, poor people and young people from one end of our country to another . . . Today Republicans are systematically and deliberately trying to stop millions of American citizens from voting.” She was presumably referring to voter ID laws, which, by the way, 51 percent of black Americans support.

Racism has an ugly past in the Democratic Party. The accusation of racism has an ugly present."
[Emphasis added, because I couldn't help it]

I read somewhere that the Ku Klux Klan has been the Terrorist arm of the Democrat Party from the very beginning of the party. That tactic became less necessary under Lyndon Johnson when the Democrats decided to use blacks rather than abuse blacks. The Democrats have cynically used blacks ever since then by employing lies like the Clinton lie, above. There are now nearly three generations of blacks who have been lied to by Democrats, and kept on the Democrat welfare plantation. White and black Democrat "leaders" have consistently used fear of whites to keep blacks in line and voting for their historic masters. These days, most "racial incidents" are phony creations of the Left intended to create racism where it doesn't exist. Find a burnt cross on someone's lawn and it's ten to one that it was put there by a Leftist. But it's "true" if it furthers the narrative, don't you know. There are no lies in a culture that knows no truth.

Be kind and give Charen a hit at this LINK.

Roger Simon: Racism and the Left

90% of the Racism in America Comes from the Democratic Party and the Left
My conclusion is inescapable. Here's why...

"Ninety percent of the racism in America today comes from the Democratic Party and the Left. They live off it and exploit it. It is unconscionable to the degree they do this, ruining the lives and futures of the very people they say they are helping in the process.

I am uniquely positioned to say this because I spent most of my life on the Left and was a civil rights worker in the South in my early twenties. I was also, to my everlasting regret, a donor to the Black Panther Party in the seventies.

So I have seen this personally from both sides and my conclusion is inescapable. The Left is far, far worse. They are obsessed with race in a manner that does not allow them to see straight. Further, they project racism onto others continually, exacerbating situations, which in most instances weren’t even there in the first place. From Al Sharpton to Hillary Clinton, they all do it."

Racism and its effluent - discord, poverty, hatred, institutionalized Victimhood, Messiahism, and constant Othering - all are to the distinct advantage of the western Left. Normal people have nothing to gain from these things, and wish to have nothing to do with them. The Left needs them, must have them, feeds solely on them. Without them, the Left are nothing. Nothing at all. They actually have no other desires except the further Messiahist craving to return Goddess Gaia to her pre-Anthropocene utopia (add eugenics to the list above).

"Barack Obama is one of the worst offenders in this regard. Recently, in reaction to the horrid actions of the deranged, but solitary racist Dylann Root, the president claimed racism is in our DNA.

How could he possibly utter such nonsense and who was he talking about? The majority of Americans are from families that came to this country after slavery existed. Many of those were escaping oppression of their own. In my case my family was fleeing the pogroms of Eastern Europe. Many of the members of my family who stayed behind ended up gassed in Auschwitz or exterminated in Treblinka.

Is Obama telling me that racism is in my DNA? What a wretched and insulting statement. If he means that, he should tell it to me face-to-face.

If he does, I will tell him what I think. The racial situation in this country has gotten decidedly worse since he took office. And he is a great deal to blame. Ever since the beer summit it was obvious he was disingenuous and harmful on the subject of race, seeking to stir the pot when it was actually empty or nearly. His claim that if he had had a son he would look like Travyon Martin was ridiculous and self-serving in the extreme. Barack Obama is a product of the fanciest private school in Hawaii and his children go to Sidwell Friends, the fanciest school in D. C."

Never forget that the very first day as president, Barack Obama cancelled the program which allowed exceptional black DC children to go to the best schools, and thereby escape their stultifying neighborhood day prisons. Had a white president done that, DC would still be smoldering cinders, edge to edge.

Read the rest at the LINK, give him a hit.

Democrats and the Confederate Flag

Democrats use Confederate flag flap in South Carolina to solicit donations

"National Democrats tried Monday evening to raise funds off the South Carolina Confederate flag flap.

In a blast email sent after 7 p.m. Monday, the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee said the issue of the Confederate flag, which zoomed to the front of national consciousness after a white supremacist was charged with nine counts of murder after a shooting at a historic black church in Charleston, was “not over yet.”

The email says Gov. Nikki Haley’s announcement is not legislation and asked recipients to answer the question, “Should South Carolina take down the Confederate flag from its state Capitol?”

It reads, “41,338 people have recorded their answer — but we still haven’t heard from you,” it asks the subscriber by name.

A person cannot answer the survey question at the DCCC site without putting in an email address, which gives the DCCC the ability to solicit contributions.

Once the person answers the question and provides an address, the page reads, “Thanks for taking the instant poll today! Now take the next step: Donate $3 or more to support Democrats, and we’ll send you this free ‘Yes. I Voted Obama’ sticker in the mail!”

There is no question about the Confederate Flag and its Democrat linkage.

The Confederate Flag

Why state governments should take down the Confederate flag

"It is long past time that state governments stopped displaying the Confederate flag, and otherwise honoring Confederate leaders. We should not honor people whose main claim to fame was waging a bloody war for the purpose of perpetuating and extending the evil institution of slavery. Some still deny that this was the motivation for Confederate secession. But overwhelming evidence proves otherwise. You don’t have to take my word for the proposition that slavery was at the root of the Confederate agenda, or even the word of John Stuart Mill. Take that of Confederate President Jefferson Davis, vice president Alexander Stephens (who called slavery “the cornerstone” of the Confederacy), and southern states’ own official statements outlining their reasons for seceding."
[go to the link for source links]

Back in the day, I was taught that the Civil war was about "states' rights", not really about slavery. I now know that this was false, that the Civil War was fought about the states' right specifically to perpetuate slavery; that was the position and the entire raison d'etre for the creation of the Democrat party in 1832 and the subsequent secession of the Democrat South. The entire nation was embroiled and bludgeoned horribly by the Democrats' insistence on racial suppression. States' Rights were just the excuse being used to preserve the slavery of blacks.

So my original neutral position on the Confederate flag has changed: I now fully oppose it being flown in any official capacity, or being used within another flag in an official capacity. The flag actually is specifically racist, being a symbol which represents, not states' rights from a federalist, 10th amendment sort of manner, but a symbol which represents official forced suppression of a race. As with all speech, the Confederate flag must not be abolished from the expression private opinion despite its onerous and obvious meaning. But its official use should be stopped.

There needs to be a better symbol for States' Rights, because it is not States' Rights which are at issue with the Confederate flag: States' Rights are guaranteed in the U.S. Constitution. But the Confederate flag is not the proper symbol for that.

UPDATE:

Representing the Difference Between Christians, and the Others, Including Media, Atheists, Muslims and SJWs

The Christian congregation which was attacked by a "millenial racist" has demonstrated restraint and forgiveness. This contrasts with the response from others, including media, AtheoLeftists, who, as says one commenter, "wave the bloody shirt". Obama called for freedoms removal, for example, before knowing whether removing Constitutional freedoms would have prevented this disaster. Try to imagine the reprisals if this were an attack on a Muslim mosque.

This obviously is a racial crime committed by a white. Does all of white America need to be held responsible for this crime, as Salon salivates? Well, let's see; are all blacks held responsible as a race for the frequent mob attacks on whites? No, that would not be justice, even in the social justice perversion of the term. But for the evil race: whites, yes, of course: all whites are responsible in the eyes of the racist anti-racists.

Defining a class of people (Classism) by the color of the skin (Racial Classism) is now de rigeur for western Leftist racists. Defending one race (A) from another race (B) by vilifying the entire race (B) for purposes of applying restrictions morally and sanctions legally against race (B) is standard racism. It has been practiced in western countries from their inceptions, and was incorporated into a political party in the USA in the early 1800s with the creation of the Democrat Party for that explicit reason (suppression of blacks, who at the time were slaves). That party has always engaged in racial strife, and still is. That political party benefits from racial strife and goes to extremes to promote it.

The fervent practice of racism is not new at all. What is new is the claim of "Social Justice" in the form of "anti-racism" which is applied to the newest anti-white racism. Never ones to object to internal contradictions and paradoxical positions, the Leftists and Democrats can convince themselves of nearly anything, so long as it is racially noxious and toxic.

An interesting bit of trivia to watch develop in this is the use of the Confederate Flag in the killer's background. That flag was an icon of the Democrat South in the days extending from the Civil War through the Jim Crow days. It is not a "white" icon; it is a political icon of the Solid (Democrat) South, and yes, it represents the ideology of racial suppression of blacks. How will that icon be handled in the upcoming discussions?

Fred, On The "Ballmer Riots"

Ballmer: A Race War in Slow Motion

The Talking-Heads Chorale will see the riots, are seeing the riots, not as an intensification of the undeclared racial war, but as a protest against racist police or the racism of whites. Oh, quite. Never mind that Ballmer’s black government sets standards for the hiring, training, and behavior of its police, and half of the accused cops are black. But the conduct of their police cannot be the fault of blacks, because nothing is.

Ominous for the future, though, is the solidarity of blacks in favor of the looters and arsonists. Our black president Obama, protecting his people, attributes the riots to racism and Republicans. Black leaders, e.g. Al Sharpton, see the villainy of whites as the cause. (I am inclined to agree that the riots involved racism, considering that black rioters reportedly burned chiefly Asian businesses.) The city’s black mayor first said “give them space” to loot. Later she told the police to stand down and let the rioters loot and burn. She has the intelligence of a raisin, but she knows whose side she is on. She isn’t alone. Supportive riots and attacks on whites, e.g. in Charleston have occurred.

...

Third, burned-out business will not return to be burned again. The city will thus have fewer jobs, fewer amenities, and no pharmacy, as they sacked and torched their CVS outlet. The Chorale will attribute this withdrawal to racism, slavery, oppression, White Privilege, and microaggressions. What else could account for not wanting one’s store burned?

In particular, blacks, having burned their pharmacy, will complain that it isn’t there. They will not see a connection between its burning it and its not-thereness. The Chorale will not see in this behavior low intelligence, short time-horizons, and inability to control impulses or to foresee consequences. No. It is the ineradicable racism of whites that makes a burned pharmacy not be there.

Two hundred businesses destroyed in Baltimore: Breitbart: . This makes sense. When something happens that I don't like, I usually go to the local Walmart, steal everything I can carry, and then burn the store. Don't you? What is really comic though is from Larry Hogan, the governor of Maryland: It “will take a little while to get back to normal, but let’s get people back to normal, get people back in the city to visit devastated shops.” Since many of those shps didn't have barbaric-population insurance, they will not reopn, and if they do, it won't be in black Ballmer.Which is what the city deserve.

As always, go to the LINK, and enjoy the photo too.

ZoNation: I Am A New Fan

I had not looked into ZoNation before now; that's my loss. I'll rectify that.



When I say these same things I get charged with racism. But they are precisely true. I'm pleased that there is such a forceful voice which cannot be charged with racism and which can so emphatically say what is true. The Left uses race (and other class warfare) by keeping entire demographics dependendent, rather than promoting them to be independent, strong, and individuals under their own power and control. And they have had four generations which they have indoctrinated as being their friend, when in reality they are the same old racist, masters and elitists that they have always been, ever since the infancy of the nation.

I'm not sure that Republicans - once the liberators of blacks, and the bestowers of their Civil Rights Acts - are any longer viable as actual friends of suppressed blacks. "Civil Rights" has backfired into welfare dependency, degrading affirmative action, and political correctness which has destroyed education. There needs to be a new civil right attached to personal development of character, intellect, and moral choice. But how could that ever happen?

Only through voices like AlfonZo's - and louder - could it ever produce results.

BTW, I still recommend this book.

Blacks Get Black History Month, But Whites...

Can't have White History Month?

Neighbors Outraged Over ‘White History Month’ Sign In Flemington Deli Window

"FLEMINGTON, N.J. (CBSNewYork) — A sign in a store window is stirring up racial tension in Flemington, New Jersey.

As WCBS 880’s Alex Silverman reported, the sign in the window of Jimbo’s Deli on Main Street says “Celebrate your white heritage in March. White History Month.”

“The ‘white’ had a cross. It was a cross ‘t,’ which is used by the Klu Klux Klan as a symbol, right,” said Bhakti Curtis.

Curtis, a bi-racial neighbor, said he couldn’t believe what he was seeing. He confronted the owner, Jim Boggess.

“He didn’t have a clue why I was offended and then why other people would be upset about it neither,” he said."

Well, if I'm offended that there is a Black History Month, what will they do about that? It turns out that being offended has no bearing on actual Human Rights. And it also turns out that the store's neighbors are racist bigots who can't stand free speech. Further, they are religious bigots, claiming that a cross - the symbol of Christianity - is a racial symbol (there are plenty of blacks who worship under a cross). But they are free to shop somewhere else; I wouldn't particularly care for racial/religious bigots shopping in my store, if I had a store (I don't).

Leftist Race War: Democrat blames Segregation On Republicans, Who Fought It Orignally Against Democrats Who Created It

Dem Rep: ‘Tea Party People’ Want To Bring Back Segregation, Get Rid Of Women’s Rights

"Democratic Missouri Congressman Emanuel Cleaver said during a Democratic town hall this weekend that he would defend against “Tea Party people” who want to go back to a time of segregation and no women’s rights. (VIDEO: Dem Rep: GOP Still Believes In Slavery, ‘Racial Superiority’)"

It's not clear that Democrats are stupid, it is possible that Cleaver, for example is just vastly ignorant. But it's also possible that he is evil, spreading the exact opposite of truth to the Democrat's black plantation captives.

Black persecution historically has ALWAYS been at the hands of the Democrats.

The Leftist Class Warriors repeat the opposite lie constantly, and apparently the Democrat Ghetto Plantation population believe it. Ignorance, controlled by evil, is powerful. That's the entire principle behind government Leftist education machinery: maleducate, control the maleducated, profit from it.

Maybe Cleaver is all of these things: an evil liar, controlling the maleducated.

Here's Charlie Rangel, claiming Republicans want slavery and racial superiority to return. On what basis does he say that? Just himself, that's all.