Planned Parenthood: The Superpower Which Slays

If there's anything we've learned from Joss Whedon (Buffy the Vampire Slayer, Firefly, The Avengers) over the years, it's this — every single one of us has a hero inside; and it's our responsibility to use our superpowers to slay.
Planned Parenthood.

Yep. They slay some 300,000 preborn humans every year. Slaying is easy. It actually takes no superpower at all. It merely takes a void where the conscience ought to be.

And that's an interesting subject. The Left rejects everything associated with received wisdom. The reason is obvious: they want full control, and allowing oneself to be subject to received wisdom means surrendering control to a higher level. So they reject all types of morality and material wisdom in favor of their own opinions, which they worship as the higher existence.

There becomes no possible violation of received wisdom which the AtheoLeft will not cheerfully violate, and do so with imperious self-righteousness. For them, morality means violating all of the received wisdom that comes their way, calling that received wisdom evil even though they reject the very concept of evil.

The AtheoLeftist inversions of moral principles are blatant and easily seen. In the case of Planned Parenthood, there is no "do not kill", or, "do no harm". Killing is what abortion is. And killing is specifically "harm".

The inversions of moral principles extend to politics with special violence; self-righteous, self-moral violence. When a member of the herd of the Othered (immoral deplorables) gets elected, that is a reassertion of received wisdom which is "immorally" in control. It then becomes the duty of the self-endowed, self-righteous, self-idolizing AtheoLeft to rid the world of this (these) immoral deplorables, and there is no moral constraint regarding the "how" for doing it.

The essence of the AtheoLeft is that they have no morality which is congruent with historical western society, that moral construction which is fundamentally Christian-based. That received morality is hated, as are the Christians who stick to it as much as possible. So hate becomes part of the set of values which the AtheoLeft has bestowed upon themselves. It's no longer a difference in social policies, no longer a difference in carefully reasoned deductions, no longer a value of tolerance. Now it is reductively distilled into pure hatred of the Other. Pure hatred: the top value of the AtheoLeft.

Stimulating Conversation Located...

In the comments, HERE

Valerie Tarico Analyzes Evangelicals

Evangelicals are hurting the GOP: The movement is now synonymous with bigotry and abject stupidity
Republicans have long sought the vote of Christian fundamentalists. This election cycle they may prove a liability

"But how much, really, is the Trump brand antithetical to the Evangelical brand? Humanist commentator James Croft argues that Trump is what Evangelicalism, in the hands of the Religious Right, has become:

“The religious right in America has always been a political philosophy based on bullying, pandering, projecting strength to hide fear and weakness, and proud, aggressive ignorance. That’s what it’s been about from the beginning. Trump has merely distilled those elements into a decoction so deadly that even some evangelicals are starting to recognize the venom they have injected into American culture.”

"Here is what the Evangelical brand looks like from the outside:

[Each of the following is expanded at the source; ed.].

Evangelical means obsessed with sex.

Evangelical means arrogant.

Evangelical means fearful and bigoted.

Evangelical means indifferent to truth.

Evangelical means gullible and greedy.

Evangelical means ignorant

Evangelical means predatory.

Evangelical means mean.

"The Evangelical brand is toxic because of the stagnant priorities and behaviors of Evangelicals themselves. Desperate to safeguard an archaic set of social and theological agreements, Evangelical leaders bet that if they could secure political power they could force a halt to moral and spiritual evolution. They themselves wouldn’t have to grow and change.

"They also believed that they could get something for nothing, that they could sell their brand and keep it too. They couldn’t have been more wrong."

Tarico is a poster child for Atheism. She demonstrates the ability to remain in the Atheist Void for her entire life, while creating an alternate reality of the purest and deepest hatred which she has based on her own set of facts. And of course she is not alone; she has many fans on the one hand, and always manages to find sources with the same level of bilious vitriol as herself for justification of her hate attacks.

An Interview With David Silverman

Meet the Fox News atheist —
the man Bill O’Reilly calls a fascist and Sean Hannity thinks is evil

[Ed.: My comments are in brackets and bold, just like this. Caution: sarcasm ahead.]

"I asked him what his goal was.

“I’m not seeking to outlaw religion,” he answered.

[Remember this when you read further down]

“Every American has the right to practice a religion. But we would be a freer state, healthier, if we dropped the myths of yesteryear. We’d be a more knowledgeable country. Just look at Scandinavia. We see the positive effects of atheism there.”

[Oh yes! Ya gotta love what has been done to Scandinavian countries by the AtheoLeft]

The most critical flaw of faith, he told me, was the notion it offers of an “objective morality” – that is, unquestionable, immutable, heaven-decreed moral absolutes that cannot evolve as our consciousness does. “The lie of objective morality that make people do bad things and think they’re doing good,” with ISIS atrocities and attacks on abortion clinics serving as obvious examples thereof. Such murderers “think they’re doing God’s work, they think they’re doing good.”

[All religion is ISIS and abortion abbatoir attackers; that’s a revelation]

I asked why he chose the present moment to publish “Fighting God.”

“We’re seeing this rise in religious hatred all over the world,” he said, “and a pushback against criticizing religion. Yet religion is the problem.

[Well, it's not the problem in China, Russia, Cuba, Venezuela, Scandinavia, the EU, etc. And not all religion.]

We see its influence all over, in abortion, gay rights, climate change.

[Oh my yes. To be against killing one’s progeny, rampant buggering, and data molesting is defined as EVIL – objective and TRUE EVIL. It has been revealed as such by… the evangelist Silverman! So it is an objective absolute.]

In Europe, the rise of Islam” – especially with the influx of Muslim refugees – “is leading to the rise of firebrand atheism, as atheists are being pushed into realizing that they have something to fight, and something to defend.

[Hm. So it’s only Atheists who realize this? Who Knew? Atheists must be the Islamophobes everyone talks about.]

In Heidelberg and Basil and Zurich I spoke to packed crowds who wanted to know more about firebrand atheism because of the fear of the rise of Islam.

[Wait, it’s ALL religion, right? Why just Islam?]

Religion is hurting our species, it’s hurting the entire world, and yet we protect it.

[That’s better. It IS all religion, then.]

We need to put religion in its place, which is back in the church.” He paused. “Religion is a scam, a lie codified in our society, demanding respect, even from the non-religious, and cannot be challenged.

[So – you had to go to Europe to challenge religion? It's codified in the USA? Like a law? Again, who knew? I could swear that you have challenged religion for a living in the USA.]

But religious opinions are opinions just like any other opinions. It’s about time for the lie to come to an end, for the lie to die.”

[So religion is a lie, which is to die? And not to be allowed? OK, then. That’s what I thought you were all about! Now confirmed.]

“How exactly is it a scam?”

“A scam takes money from people for a promise that’s never kept. Religion tells people they will get to heaven. But they never get to heaven.

[Alriiiight! Promise never kept! There's no heaven! There must be facts and data coming next to support this claim; I can’t wait!]

Religion lies, takes money, funnels money to preachers and then demands respect.

[Whoa, what happened to the PROOF? This is not proof. It is a blanket condemnation based on lack of evidence cum ignorance of actual religion. Again where is the objective empirical proof for this? Obviously it's not required, since the Atheist evangelist has declared "religion" to be EVIL... absolutely, objectively, morally EVIL. So it's the Atheist MORAL CODE.]

No really powerful god would have to demand respect. So I refuse to give respect.”

[Oh, now I understand. You know precisely what a deity would do, because… um, why?]

Does disrespecting faith work as a tactic?

“Yes! When no one shows disrespect for religion, those inside the churches feel afraid and abandoned.

[Oh man. You are so powerful that believers actually cower at your disrespect? Impressive!]

Yet religion deserves no more respect than tarot cards or astrology.

[Uh oh. Bad analogy. Those things can be tested empirically.]

This is an outreach effort to those inside the churches.

[Oh yes! Those inside churches are desperate to hear how superior you are to them and their inferior, backward ways which you disrespect with such splendiferous arrogance and intellectual emptiness. Yes, that’ll work.]

We’re saying, you can get out! We can grow the movement by spreading atheism, but also by getting atheists who don’t call themselves atheists to call themselves what they are.

[So they're all held captive in there? And your Atheism will free them to hate like you do? That’s the way to dream.]

Ninety percent of atheists don’t call themselves atheists; the real number [of atheists] isn’t 3 percent but 35 percent.

[Not according to the experts who take the polls.]

All I need to do to multiply the movement by a factor of ten is get atheists to call themselves atheists, we don’t have to change opinions about God. There are even atheists behind pulpits.”

[Yes. Dream the Dream! So many people can't wait to hate... you can lead the way!]

What Silverman is cannot be characterized as evidence-based, logic-based or rational; he is an evangelist who spouts hatred for religion. In other words, an evangelistic hate monger in pseudo-rational clothes.

There is more at the SITE, but I stopped here because it is enough to demonstrate the “thought” process of the guy.

NY Atheists Complain About Street Name Which Is "Insulting"

NY atheists demand sign honoring 9-11 firefighters be removed

"Fox News radio reports Tuesday that a group of atheists are demanding the City of New York remove a street sign that pays homage to seven heroic firefighters who were killed in the Sept 11, 2001 terror attacks.

The street - dedicated last weekend outside the Brooklyn firehouse where the firefighters once served - was christened "Seven in Heaven Way." Fox News reports that the "ceremony was attended by dozens of firefighters, city leaders and widows of the fallen men."

It's the word "heaven" that has the atheists in an uproar. According to them, that word violates separation of church and state.

“There should be no signage or displays of religious nature in the public domain,” said Ken Bronstein, president of New York City Atheists, who objects to the use of the word heaven. “It’s really insulting to us,” he added.

“We’ve concluded as atheists there is no heaven and there’s no hell,” he explained.

That, to him, makes it a “totally religious statement." "It’s a question of separation of church and state,” he said.

Bronstein didn't care that the sign was honoring fallen heroes.

Fox News Radio reported:

David Silverman, president of American Atheists, agreed and called on the city to remove the sign.

“It implies that heaven actually exists,” Silverman told Fox News Radio. “People died in 9-11 but they were all people who died, not just Christians. Heaven is a specifically Christian place. For the city to come up and say all those heroes are in heaven now, it’s not appropriate.”

“All memorials for fallen heroes should celebrate the diversity of our country and should be secular in nature. These heroes might have been Jews, they might have been atheists, I don’t know but either way it’s wrong for the city to say they’re in heaven. It’s preachy.”

But city leaders contend the group had an opportunity to express their opinion during the public approval process.

Craig Hammerman, the district manager for Brooklyn Community Board Six said that "not a single person stood up to speak out against it."

“It’s unfortunate that they didn’t raise this as an issue while it was undergoing its public review either at the community board level or when it came before the city council on their public agenda,” he said, noting that "it’s a little late in the process" for the complaint to be made now.

Perhaps, but the atheists would get more press coverage by whining about the sign after it's already in place."

So. They are perpetually insulted by any government action which is not specifically Atheist... because they have concluded that there is no heaven or hell.

Maybe we need a "separation of Atheism and state" amendment.

American Atheists Are Radicalizing Around Their Cartoon

American Atheist Al Stefanelli creates a Straw Christian to hate, and incite others to hate:

American Atheist leader says fundamentalist Christians 'must be eradicated'

"In a shocking blog post at atheists.org, Al Stefanelli, Georgia State Director of American Atheists, Inc., calls for the eradication of "individuals who abide by fundamentalist Christian and radical Islamic doctrines."

"They don’t respond to lawsuits, letters, amicus briefs or other grass-roots campaigns and they must, must, must be eradicated," he writes.

He goes on to write:

As long as they are allowed to exist, we will continue to be inundated with accounts of buses, buildings, markets and abortion clinics being blown up, rape victims being murdered for adultery, wives being beaten (sometimes to death), airplanes being flown into buildings, people being tortured and sometimes beheaded for blasphemy, people being burned for witchcraft and sorcery and all the other horrific, inhumane and insane practices that are part of fundamental Christianity and Radical Islam.

While it is true that many terror attacks have been carried out by radical Islamists, the same absolutely cannot be said of those who currently follow the teachings of Jesus Christ in the United States. The last judicial execution for witchcraft in the United States, for example, was in 1692, according to bibliotecapleyades.net.

Naturally, Stefanelli did not cite any examples of Christians actually participating in such acts, but he does single out what he calls "idiotic, ignorant and imbicillic politicians and celebrities like Palin, Bachmann, Beck, Limbaugh, Pawlenty and Santorum."

But who, exactly, is Stefanelli targeting?

"Most of the GOP, just about all of the Tea Party movement and even some Democrats and Independents," he writes, adding they "should be ashamed of themselves for going out in public wearing the equivalent of an intellectual diaper."

Why?

Because they have the audacity to believe what their religious doctrine teaches.

He smears religious people as lacking "the maturity and intelligence to act in a socially acceptable manner," calling them "sociopaths," "psychopaths," and claims "all of them are clearly delusional."

He claims:

The fact is that fundamentalist Christians and radical Muslims are not interested in coexisting or getting along. They have no desire for peace. They do not want to sit down with us in diplomatic efforts to iron out our differences and come to an agreement on developing an integrated society.

They want us to die.

While one could easily make the argument regarding radical Muslims who have, in fact, flown airplanes into buiildings (Google "9/11") and beheaded people for being "infidels," the same cannot be said for modern-day Christians. Again, Stefanelli provides no proof of his assertions.

Billy Hallowell of The Blaze observes:

He encourages “mainstream believers” within both faiths to be “intolerant of fundamental Christianity and radical Islam.” Based on his writings it seems Stefanelli also takes issue with atheists and non-believers who are content accepting the beliefs of those he finds so unintellectual and radical.

Ironically, while calling for the eradication of those who follow their religious beliefs, Stefanelli writes in response to a comment calling him out for his violent rhetoric:

"It is most certainly NOT a call for violence. Not once did I ever suggest that we use weapons, violence or physical contact. Not once. Nor did I say we be “mean” to them," he wrote.

No, he just doesn't think these people have a right to exist, and they "must, must, must be eradicated." No violence or 'meanness' implied there.

"These are not the droids you are looking for.""