A former 40 year Atheist analyzes Atheism, without resorting to theism, deism, or fantasy.
***
If You Don't Value Truth, Then What DO You Value?
***
If we say that the sane can be coaxed and persuaded to rationality, and we say that rationality presupposes logic, then what can we say of those who actively reject logic?
***
Atheists have an obligation to give reasons in the form of logic and evidence for rejecting Theist theories.
Showing posts with label Facebook. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Facebook. Show all posts
Sunday, February 18, 2018
Monday, January 29, 2018
Friday, October 6, 2017
YouTube: Keeping It Quiet
Lies of Omission:
YouTube is filtering out stories on the Las Vegas shooting – Here’s whyCould it possibly be because the shooter was LEFTIST?? Maybe even ISLAMIC Leftist?? This is quickly going down the memory hole, isn't it...
Sunday, January 8, 2017
Tuesday, May 24, 2016
Surprise! Facebook Exonerates Itself. (Now With Update).
In the memorandum referenced below, Facebook outlines its procedures and guidelines. It also lists the retro-testing done in order to find any imbalance in political content which is accepted for publication in "trending". The counsel for Facebook says that no imbalance was found.
This quite possibly is the truth. But under normal jurisprudence no defendant would be allowed the final say in the truth of his own subjective claims. Facebook should know, if only intuitively, that objective, disinterested investigation is necessary. That means by outside sources which are not invested in Facebook.
Taken in context of other Facebook activities which seem to breech ethical principles such as privacy, the memorandum seems comprehensive yet not persuasive. And the lack of a disinterested investigation contributes to skepticism.
UPDATE:
This quite possibly is the truth. But under normal jurisprudence no defendant would be allowed the final say in the truth of his own subjective claims. Facebook should know, if only intuitively, that objective, disinterested investigation is necessary. That means by outside sources which are not invested in Facebook.
Taken in context of other Facebook activities which seem to breech ethical principles such as privacy, the memorandum seems comprehensive yet not persuasive. And the lack of a disinterested investigation contributes to skepticism.
Facebook Memo to John ThuneThe objective truth of the situation will probably never be known for certain.
UPDATE:
Too fat for Facebook: photo banned for depicting body in 'undesirable manner'Don't EVEN try to censor Feminists!
Facebook has apologized for wrongly banning a photo of plus-sized model Tess Holliday for violating its ‘health and fitness’ advertising policy
Monday, May 9, 2016
Facebook: Artificially Truncated News, Conveniently Pre-Biased To The Left For The Ease Of Your Indoctrination
Of course it is.
I dropped Facebook after about 6 months. They are intent on spying and manipulating rather than providing a useful but benign product.
Former Facebook Workers: We Routinely Suppressed Conservative NewsIf you get your news from a single source, then it's not news; it's propaganda. With the web available everywhere, there's no excuse for using just one source, unless you just don't care enough to know what's real and true.
"Rather, Facebook’s efforts to play the news game reveal the company to be much like the news outlets it is rapidly driving toward irrelevancy: a select group of professionals with vaguely center-left sensibilities. It just happens to be one that poses as a neutral reflection of the vox populi, has the power to influence what billions of users see, and openly discusses whether it should use that power to influence presidential elections.
“It wasn’t trending news at all,” said the former curator who logged conservative news omissions. “It was an opinion.”"
I dropped Facebook after about 6 months. They are intent on spying and manipulating rather than providing a useful but benign product.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)


