Nolte Nails It

Nolte: No Coincidence Pro-Rape Hollywood and Media are Anti-Gun

By my count, more than 90 women have come forward to accuse disgraced Hollywood mogul Harvey Weinstein of everything from the very worst kinds of sexual harassment to straight-up rape.

Ninety.

Assuming even half of those allegations are true, is it any wonder that Weinstein is so stridently anti-gun? Is it confusing to anyone exactly why an alleged serial sexual predator would devote so much of his energy and wealth towards disarming the public?
Weinstein, however, appears to be the least of it…

According to the latest numbers, there are 67 men in Hollywood who stand accused of abusing women and children. A few of those men are even accused of abusing other men. Moreover, the Hollywood Reporter reveals that “these stories are just the tip of the iceberg. Even now, my colleagues here and elsewhere are on the hunt, chasing hundreds of tips about harassment in many and varied forms[.]”

Imagine that. Those 67 are merely the “tip of the iceberg.”

Hundreds, maybe thousands of victims; their lives forever destroyed by powerful men who see vulnerable women as little more than blow-up dolls created to serve their sexual deviancy.

Is it any wonder, then, that Hollywood, a town ruled by left-wing men, an institution dedicated to sexual abuse and shielding those abusers, is anti-gun, would prefer their pool of victims defenseless?

And it is not just Hollywood.

There is also our national media.

High-powered men work(ed) for NBC News, ABC News, NPR, Vox, the New Republic, the New York Times. Mother Jones… all accused of various forms of misconduct towards women.

If these allegations are true, is it any wonder that the powerful men who guide these media outlets, who shape conventional wisdom within the media, would prefer an unarmed populace, would feel better knowing a woman cannot suddenly equalize a situation with a firearm?

Watch this 78-second video, watch a seething Mark Halperin attempt to humiliate one of his alleged victims, Emily Miller, over the issue of guns:

Halperin stands accused of masturbating in front of women, rubbing his clothed erection up against women, throwing women up against walls… If guilty, should we be surprised that such a man would be so hostile towards a female Second Amendment advocate, an apostle for the idea of women arming themselves?

CNN’s Chris Cuomo believes 12 year-old girls should be exposed to a penis. Of course he is anti-gun.

Alec Baldwin, an admitted sexist bully, is anti-gun.

Gee, I wonder why a monster addicted to bullying those weaker than him is opposed to an equalizer?

We have been told again and again and again and again, that in Hollywood and in the elite media, EVERYONE KNEW, it was an OPEN SECRET.
Thought experiment…

The year is 1992 and Hollywood becomes an industry filled with women who purchase firearms, get the NRA training available to safely learn how to use them, and obtain the permits required to carry what is the only tool available that puts them on equal footing with an abusive man.

In that culture, some 25 years later, do we have a Harveywood scandal? Are there 90 women coming forward to allege the anti-gun Weinstein raped and harassed them?

Now do the same thought experiment with our elite media.

Men who rape, assault, grope, harass, or masturbate in front of women, are not driven by sexual attraction. This appalling behavior is about demeaning, degrading, humiliating, shattering, and debasing women — it is purely a power thing.

And the last thing powerful abusers want is a victim able to immediately equalize the situation through the simple act of reaching into a purse.

Our media and entertainment industries are infected with powerful men who contemplate a city full of helpless, unarmed women like a lion contemplates a herd of gazelle.

There are countless reasons our Morning Joe-elites so desire a helpless population, and not a single one of those reasons has to do with stopping mass-shooters. Despite all these terrible events, not a single elite calling for more gun control can come up with a law that would have stopped even one of these massacres. In other words…

Our elites are not in favor of gun control to stop mass-shootings, rather, they are in favor of using mass-shootings to push the gun control that will result in a more vulnerable populace that is easier to control and victimize.

Hollywood and media elites are all about consolidating power through a centralized government, all about gushing over dictators like Fidel Castro, Che Guevera, Hugo Chavez, and all about making their dreams come true by means of an overreaching government able to bully helpless Americans.

That same philosophy, of course, applies to men who abuse women. Their worst nightmare is a woman with a gun and the training to use it.

So of course our pro-rape media and pro-rape entertainment industry spend billions of corporate dollars on propaganda designed to keep their victims defenseless.

Of course they do.

UPDATE:

Report: Manhattan D.A. to Indict Weinstein on Rape Charges Next Week

I Didn't Believe It Was This Bad

Sexual assault and harassment is closer to the norm than decency is, it appears - at least in LeftyWorld. The blow-up quickly went from Hollywood males and their female enablers to Sacramento politicians, TV news, and now to NPR. Prior Lefty sex pervs include Bill Clinton and Al Gore, and of course gropy-Uncle-Joe Biden. Not to ignore establishment Republican George HW Bush who gropes from his wheelchair. And now it is released that Congress maintains a slush fund to pay off sexual assault accusers of Congress pervs as well. In fact, Congress passed a bill intended to protect Congressional pervs from the consequences of their perversions.

Well, what is to be expected when a nation rejects objective morality in favor of "if it feels good, do it" as the moral directive. For the Left it is power that feels good, because power enables all sorts of other abusive behaviors which "feel good" to the powerful, at the expense of their victims. And make no mistake, the Left craves power, goes insane when deprived of power, and immediately abuses the less powerful when they have it (never forget how ObamaCare got passed).

To mangle a phrase, "Power corrupts, especially when the corrupt seize power".

The Left has never been the "principled opposition"; not from the French Revolution, and not from the American pro-slavery Leftist. From the Democrat Party inception in 1828 to the present the Democrat focus has been suppression of dissent and Will To Power, both of which have been used through the violence of the KKK, Jim Crow, seditious terrorists, killers and bombers such as Bill Ayers, and now Antifa (the same as the German communists pre-WWII). But the internal violence against women by powerful Leftist men has been merely rumored until now. It does help explain the moral pass given to Muslims in their treatment of women.

The rumors of pedophilia are leaking faster out of Hollywood now, as more ex-child actors come forward. So how far will the pedophilia strain of virulent corruption extend? Clear to Congress and DC, probably. And starting with the Clintons and other riders on the "Lolita Express" to Pedophile Island.

Again, when morality is defenestrated, corruption of the heinous sort is guaranteed to follow. And that corruption is called the new morality.

Erdogan's thug is ID'ed; Will He Be Charged?

BOMBTHROWERS EXCLUSIVE: Erdogan thug is Democrat donor

Left-wingers can't keep their hands to themselves

This is the face of "The Resistance" that the Leftists and Donks in general are prescribing in their mindless fury at losing the election to the bitter clingers, fly-overs, and Deplorables. This summer will encourage more thuggery by the Left, and these barbarians will surface. Possibly en masse. We'll see, and then we'll know what must be done.

Democrats and the Value of Life

Democrats showed absolutely no concern for the thousand people (including at least on American peace officer) who were killed with the weapons given to the Mexican drug cartels.

Democrats showed no concern over the killing-by-negligence of those trapped in Benghazi, including an American ambassador.

Democrats showed no concern over the assassination of one of their own, Seth Rich.

Now Democrats might be just a little concerned, about their own skins.

Leftist Proxy Murder

University Art Exhibit Features Painting of Captain America Holding President Trump's Decapitated Head

"Painting Professor Thomas Chung created and presented the piece as part of a faculty art program, KTUU reported.

Chung said he chose to paint the scene because he was upset at the results of the 2016 election.

"I spent days just weeping," he told the station, adding that he was surprised at his own reaction because he is not a "political person."

The Murder instinct is strong in the weeping Left.

Comey

Friendly Atheist Supports the Privilege of Murder

Friendly Atheist supports “Wrongful Birth” responsibility and punishment for physicians involved with the birth of a disabled child.

Texas Lawmakers Think Doctors Should Be Able to Lie to Women if the Truth Could Lead to an Abortion

Earlier this week, lawmakers in Texas advanced Senate Bill 25, a bill that would allow doctors to not tell pregnant patients if something is wrong wth their unborn child. Why? Because it’s possible that if you know that there are fetal abnormalities — ranging from severe disabilities to the possibility that the child could be stillborn, or born with its brain outside of its head, or something like that — then you might consider the perfectly legal procedure known as an abortion.

The precedent for this current hoorah is a court case in which parents claimed that they would have killed the disabled progeny in utero, had they known about the disability. The apparent claim is that the doctor did not properly inform them of the in utero defect, thus denying them their right to kill it. Hence the term “wrongful birth” which means denial of opportunity to kill the unborn before birth in order specifically to deny the disabled human the opportunity for life. “Wrongful birth” is a pseudonym for anti-disability bias. The existing, living child was wanted to be dead.

The current Texas bill prevents the punishment of the physician for a condition which the physician did not cause, and purports to support human life as priority. This is a response to the punishment of the physician over denial of the right of the choice to kill (for the purpose of not wanting to care for a disabled person).

Here’s the analysis of the bill, by the Texas Senate Research Center:

AUTHOR'S / SPONSOR'S STATEMENT OF INTENT

The wrongful birth cause of action was first recognized in the Texas Supreme Court in 1975 in Jacobs v Theimer. The parents of the disabled child argued they would have terminated the pregnancy if they had known about the disabilities beforehand. The Texas Supreme Court awarded the parents the recovery of expenses reasonably necessary for the care and treatment of their child's physical impairment for its entire life. This ruling was based on the existence of a life.

C.S.S.B. 25 prohibits the wrongful birth cause of action. This legislation is consistent with Texas values that all lives are valuable and that child birth is prioritized. C.S.S.B. 25 will end the negative precedent that disabled persons should not have been born and also hold doctors accountable for their action, not holding them liable for disabilities they did nothing to cause.

C.S.S.B. 25 amends current law relating to eliminating the wrongful birth cause of action.

Note that “would have terminated the pregnancy” specifically means the intent to kill the disabled before the disabled could be protected under law (after birth). The existence of a living, disabled, post-natal child was a punishable offense deemed to be caused by the physician, who ultimately was forced to support the disabled child for that child's entire life.

So what the “Friendly Atheist” is complaining about is the appearance of loss of opportunity to kill progeny, in utero, for the convenience and financial benefit of the parents. This is anti-disabled, pro-killing of humans which obviously resulted in a living human, a human which was resented for having disabilities causing inconvenience for the parents. So the resentment of the “wrongful birth”, inconvenience to parents, and distaste for disabled humans was cause to punish the physician.

Child to parent:
“Why don’t you work like other people have to do?”

Parent to child:
“We won a lawsuit punishing the physician for allowing you to live, instead of allowing us to kill you like we should have done.”

But what about prior conventions and legal commitments for Doctors? Is the doctor ethically and legally responsible for total disclosure?

What is a Doctor's Duty to Disclose?
A doctor is required to disclose all relevant information regarding your medical treatment in order to allow you to make a decision about your own treatment. If a doctor fails to disclose pertinent information, he may be liable for medical malpractice.
What Information Does a Doctor Have to Disclose?
The doctor's duty to disclose includes:
• What the treatment involves
• The possible risks of receiving the treatment as well as the possible risks of not receiving it
• The success rate of the operation
• Alternative treatments

This leads to an obvious observation: a pregnant woman is considered to be two people if she is murdered and the fetus also dies. Under what circumstances does this two-people-in-one concept not hold? Obviously abortion is claimed to be the removal of part of the woman (not a separate human existence), which she wants rid of. So the woman has rights, and could have a lawyer. The unborn progeny cannot in all likelihood be represented in court as a separate human, at least ever since Roe v Wade.

The result is that one of the two-in-one people has the privilege of legal representation for recourse due to perceived harm, but the other of the two people has zero defense or recourse for harm, including murder. The murder, in utero, is now a right of the individual who is imbued with privilege, which is to be forced upon the individual without privilege.

The privilege of condoned murder is an awesome privilege, and one that is cherished as precious by the AtheoLeft. It is part of the tribalist Class War system, in which the fetus has been claimed by some to be an oppressor of the woman in the same sense that a malignant tumor would be oppressive to her. By using tribalist, classist segregation of humans into Victim Classes, disposable Oppressor Classes, and the self-righteous messiah class, the AtheoLeft is able to form its own elite "morality" into classes deserving salvation as well as classes deserving annihilation. Annihilation is perfectly Darwinian, and scientifically acceptable.

So there is no justice available to a fetus, much less a disabled fetus.